you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

Oh, disagree. By definition propaganda misrepresents the truth, which makes it at best an untrustworthy tool for achieving a goal. Good and evil are facile concepts that don't carry enough nuance for this discussion, but generally speaking one who spreads propaganda should not be trusted, even if their goals or intentions apparently align with your own.

Communication is a means of spreading ideas. Propaganda is a means of spreading a specific idea with an ulterior motive, at the expense of honesty and forthrightness.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 hours ago

    It would certainly be simpler if propaganda was definitionally dishonest, but I don't believe that's the case.

    Propaganda can be completely truthful, it just rarely is.

    All definitions I've found suggest that dishonesty, loaded language, presenting limited selective facts, and calls to emotion are all tactics available to propagandists, but not required to meet the definition.

  • source
  • parent