158
Linus Torvalds says Linux kernel is out of 'stabilization phase' and using 'much healthier model' for AI contributions (www.theregister.com)
submitted 9 hours ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

Just because it's open source it doesn't mean there's not a person or group of people deciding what happens to the 'main'/'upstream' version of it.

Sure you can fork it, and remove all AI contributions, but who will use your fork?

When people say "the Linux kernel", they mean the version maintained by Linus Torvalds. They might mean a fork for a specific SoC or manufacturer or distro, but those are all just the Linux Kernel maintained by Linus Torvalds plus a few patch sets. There's no considerable divergence.

Linus' stance was initially "no AI written code". And he does have final say in what goes into the repo he maintains. Now he's changed that tune, he allows AI written code, and no matter how many forks you make to strip it out... what matters is Linus' upstream.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago

    Sure you can fork it, and remove all AI contributions, but who will use your fork?

    This actually should be done. Let there be options. But the human fork won't magically return you to the previous world of no-AI. AI will still audit it and find vulnerabilities humans can't. Time will tell which version prevails, but I think at best the human fork will have only a niche use. Perhaps in education.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent