12
is Conservative/Right Wing opinions completely unwelcome on Lemmy? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 3 years ago* by to c/politics@beehaw.org
142 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I don't have much of a problem either way as I don't think I'll be engaging in political discussion on this website past this post but it seems like any sort of non-left wing opinions or posts are immediately trashed on here. That's fine. There's clearly a more liberal audience here and that's okay. I just don't want Lemmy to become a echo chamber for any side and it seems to be that way when it comes to politics already.

Mostly making this post just to drum up discussion as I'm new here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 3 years ago (2 children)

I guess it depends on which conservative or right wing opinions you're talking about.

The traditional conservative opinion of smaller government hasn't existed now for 50 years. Reagan, Bush, and Trump all grew the size of government.

The conservative talking point of "states rights!" flies in the face of states who want safe and legal abortions, or equal access to marriage rights, or the ability to acknowledge that LGBTQ+ kids actually exist.

Similarly if you're talking about the conservative push to make it harder for black and brown people to vote, and make no mistake about it, they are specifically targeting black and brown people.

Let's not even open the door to the fringe anti-vax or "election was stolen" movements.

So with all that conservative messaging off the table, what are you left with, honestly?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Conversation with right, left, middle, whatever are only productive if based on a principalled ideology. I disagree with the NeoCons of Bush and Cheney, but at least there is an ideology to work with. MAGA, on the other hand is defined by no principals other than authoritarian aims of "winning" where "winning" is making the other side mad.

    The post truth world we live in makes this hard, though. Right now there is no shared truth, and with varied truthinesses out there, it makes the conversation hard. Using flat earthers as an example, the sheer rejection of math and science is astounding; having a principalled conversation is hard when the foundations are different.

    And with 24hr news, breaking news, and global news, and only so much news worthy content, there is an incentive to come with with differentiation and that creates eco chambers. News Max isn't going to bring on a CNN contributor (and vice versa) to challenge their views.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    This is a good point. There are conservative viewpoints I find compelling, but they have basically nothing in common with MAGA, de santis, or any other popular conservative these days.

    I find I can talk with individuals, when we both view the other as individuals, instead of a representative of republicans or whatever other moniker you give them. I mean, not everyone, but at least most people.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent