you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The value of a hotel stay includes a lot more than the stripped back services these people have access to, it's not like they are on holiday, and they're in rooms not meant to accommodate families or extended stays which can make it an unpleasant experience, not whatever you're imagining.
Hostels have even less infrastructure to deal with people in them or deal with government bureaucracy that goes with any of these programs.
Camps like ex army bases have been suggested and I think even trialled but have their own issues, soldiers will put up with the bare minimum and the bases are no longer fit to provide that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago (4 children)

    Soldiers are treated better than detained migrants and despite that, there have been court cases over mistreatment of soldiers in army bases.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    How is it key? Many detained migrants don't work mainly because the government prohibits it since Blair.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    Incorrect - detained migrants aren't allowed to work due to a government decision, even if they had a work visa when they entered the country legally. Working used to be allowed if the border force failed to decide whether someone was a refugee in good time.

  • source
  • parent