you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 20 hours ago* (3 children)

Copy machine output doesn't count as original works.

Movies that retell stories openly are adaptations that give credit to the original source. AI slop does not give attriution to what it is copying.

Movies that are inspired by prior works, which is basically everything, but intentionally do a new take are art because they have intent and meaning even if done poorly. AI slop is just regurgitating stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

    I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, I agree that a copy machine is not sentient. You can’t just decide that an inanimate object is "art" and then work backwards to say that the non-sentient tools that were used to create the work are the real artist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments