They're always a few versions behind, but somehow manage to get credit for the "innovation".

Don't they use Samsung displays though? If so I would have expected a similarly matured display vs this but maybe that is no longer the case anymore. It has been well over a decade since I cared about anything iPhone related, so I could be well out of date here

As a occasional bleeding edge buyer - I disagree with the motive of 'look at me'. (caveat: This post is entirely 'look at me', but I'm proving my point, not desiring attention, and have never even thought about my purchases this way until now)

I had an HTC Magic - one of the very early Android phones - not because I wanted to be cool, but because I wanted the tech and google was still this sort of open, consumer-friendly company at the time vs Apple. That phone was pretty solid compared to the candy-bar or flip phones of the era, aside from battery life, but compared to modern smart phones it was garbage.

I had an OG Rift VR headset (CV1). It did what it claimed, but it was low resolution, clunky, heavy, and unpleasant to use. But now we have Steam's Frame.

When I was a teenager, working retail at a tech store, I saved up to buy an early LCD monitor. Now you can't even buy CRTs outside of niche vendors.

I want quality EVs. I never bought a Tesla, but I wanted one before the crazy came out and just couldn't afford it. Now we have every auto manufacturer making EV options.

I want quality folding phones, but my normal shape phone is still functional and I haven't needed to buy a new one for a few years. When I do, it'll probably fold. I'll be v3 or so by that time, but still showing there's a desire.

I want to be clear that I'm not disagreeing with your 'let others work out the kinks', but sometimes I'm fine with having the first iterations because I want the resulting tech.

Consider this my investment strategy - but instead of personal profit, I'm investing in innovation.