66
Why do so few self-host? (r1b.it)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Is it just up-front cost? I understand that for larger instances because they'd have to setup heftier systems, but even micro-instances seem to rent cloud compute when they could probably get by with port-forwarding to an old laptop.

Edit: I understand that self-hosting is a skill that takes years to learn, and I'm aware that the vast majority of people on Earth choose to spend their time and energy investing into completely different topics. However, Lemmy tends to attract the techy type, so I suppose I just assumed the ratio of self-hosters-to-not would be higher. I'm not saying it's trivial, just that I presume more Lemmings know how to do it than, say, Redditors (taking total users into account ofc)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 day ago (1 child)

The lack of knowledge, which others here already pointed out, is only one part of it. I have a knowledge due to my education and work, but I really don't want to. I selfhost the stuff, that I use personally and locally and access it through a VPN. But a ActivityPup Server, that would need to be reachable from outside, I really dont want to bother with.

Just doing a port-forwarding, like you suggested, is not a great idea security-wise, if you dont take additional precautions. You'd probably want the publicly hosted stuff in a completely different subnet from your LAN, that all your other devices use. Or at least have VLANs setup. All of which is not easily possible, or even impossible, with the standard consumer networking hardware most have at home.

Additionally, you'd need to take care of system and application updates, backups and so on, which takes a significant amount of time.

All in all I really don't care enough about social media in general to justify the hassle.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •