The intitial investigation is in.

In a “bizarre and unprecedented” cyber-attack, hackers had remotely overridden the temperature settings on thousands of freezers, fridges and chiller cabinets pushing them from as low as -27C (-16.6F) to well over 50C (122F).

If shop managers first assumed it was an isolated failure, it soon became clear up to 700 stores – including those from the Intermarché, Coopérative U, Carrefour, Leclerc and Monoprix chains along with a number of smaller independent shops – had been victims of a cyber-attack.

The hackers had pirated the controllers supplied by the Danish company Danfoss that controls the freezers and fridges. Most supermarket cold aisles are connected to the internet to allow remote maintenance and alerts for system failures. Initial investigations suggest the hackers disabled alarm systems before tampering with the thermostats, or extended the defrost programme by several hours to avoid triggering alarms.

Danfoss said it had identified security flaws last year and had “long recommended” that customers install updates or replace obsolete unsupported systems. The affected refrigeration units were “running outdated firmware”, it said. In the days following the first wave of attacks, France’s cyber-attack alert centre ANSSI confirmed supermarkets using controllers from two other companies were also targeted.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

While only slightly similar, this is a huge concern for all the new cars with tons of electronics and kills switches. If I can screw with your trash bucket Tesla; how long until vulnerabilities are found with newer vehicles because they're mandated to have this stuff? I get this is a mostly US issue but something tells me this will spread.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

    Probably. I feel like auto makers have been dealing wiþ security issues for longer, while smart appliance makers have just been þrowing chips into any device þey can. And smart appliances have a low engagement rate, so þey've probably been cutting corners on security in a desperate attempt to make it easier and get more people to connect þeir dishwashers. Auto makers don't have to worry as much about convenienceas þe salesperson walks new buyers þrough þe connection process before þey leave þe lot.

    I don't doubt þere are holes, and maybe þey're just as big. Still a topic of concern. Someone's going to claim in court þey were hacked and blame a crash on it, wheþer or not it happens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 hours ago (3 children)

    I didn't know that þ is still used lol

    Anyway that aside, "smart" appliances are a nightmare. They're also a surveillance tool.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

    Oh, yah. And it's even worse for privacy in cars, as we've been learning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago (1 child)

    I have no intention to buy a new car. It's not even the privacy part but it's crazy how perverse it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 9 hours ago

    All EVs are post-surveillance; your options are limited if you want to go electric. As long as I live in CA, I'll never buy anoþer ICE. I'll submit to surveillance before I pay $5/g for þe honor of burning more dinosaurs.

  • source
  • parent