Currently, anyone who uses a television to watch content must pay the licence fee even if they do not watch the BBC. Under the proposed changes it would be expanded to cover all other online providers, such as Netflix, Amazon, Disney+, YouTube, which are currently exempt.

The Whitehall source explained that the move was “because people are able to use them to avoid paying currently”. They added: “It’s not fair that people are essentially able to watch television content but avoid the licence fee.”

Why would the BBC be allowed to collect money on services it does not provide? This is basically saying "everyone must pay this fee, or unplug their internet".

At that point, you might as well just take it from the government budget.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 days ago (3 children)

Except they did actually exist and did actually work.
https://youtu.be/U8mSHKsyWDw

Well, for analog CRTs

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Yeah, all the info in that video is super sketchy, the em interference signal it refers to would be detectable within a few inches at most with today's technology

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago

    Uh huh.

    Mate, I can hear the squealing whine of a flyback transformer through brick walls with my own ears. I DO NOT miss the days when everyone had two or three of the fucking things screaming away all day.

    Detecting the magnetic flux those things produce isn't magic, tricky, or a cover-up. It just requires a sensitive antenna array tuned to the right frequency.

    Now, since the shift to flat panel displays a TV doesn't announce it's presence in such an obvious fashion. This makes detecting a TV a much more difficult prospect, arguably not impossible, but not likely within their budget nowadays.

  • source
  • parent