The average experience of interacting with end users 😭

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 74 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (32 children)

Most based opinion ever. I don't understand why GitHub can't have a dedicated "download" button; why they can't put it right on the top of the page, and make it a requirement? I'm tired of having to hunt around for the "releases" section, assuming it's even there to begin with (and half the time it isn't)! Sometimes the developer buries the download button in the middle of the description instead, sometimes they don't include it at all and expect you to compile it yourself. It's inconsistent and bullshit.

  • source
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 day ago (15 children)

    GitHub is designed for sharing code. Executable downloads are not really supposed to be there, but small projects with no budget won’t put in the effort and money to host their own downloads on a separate website.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Don’t worry, these days some scammer will use an LLM to generate a site for your project and fill it with malware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago

    I love the side quest of installing something from GitHub; it's rarely simple. Usually some combination of docker, cmake, python, etc… sometimes you get a release for your system that actually works if lucky

    I empathise with the OOP's crashout 😂

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -19 points 1 day ago (10 children)

    That's a poor excuse because oftentimes the only place you can download the program from is GitHub. Developers are literally placing a link to the GitHub on their websites.

    Therefore it doesn't matter what GitHub is designed for, it matters what it's used for. You develop around the need, not the intention.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago

    If you don’t know how to navigate Github then you are not the target audience for that specific program.

    You’re wandering out of the walled garden into the jungle and then you complain there aren’t any neatly maintained trails.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 18 hours ago

    And they developed the tool, and they're rarely paid enough to spin up a separate Web host just to share a wizard. GitHub is perfectly fine for simple archives and executables with little setup and provisioning. You also need to buy a static address to host your own content or use DynDNS, which adds more provisioning and setup.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Beggars can’t be choosers my dude. People giving away their hobby projects for free don’t owe you anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    What a piss poor attitude. Regardless, this isn't a developer problem, it's a website problem. Microsoft needs to fix this regardless of what you people think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 17 hours ago

    What solution do you propose to compile every type of language that has or has not been written into executable formats that have or have not been made yet for systems that do or will exist? I'm just curious about how that should happen, given your expert opinion on the matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    You do realize that for most of the projects you talk about, the devs are volunteers producing code on their free time, and they put it on Github so that other devs can re-use that code?

    They don't owe you a "release" or a ".exe" or whatever you're expecting. They have no excuse to give you.

    And more often that not, when there is no ready-to-click download button with a nice .exe, that's because the dev is spending more time working on the code itself and considers it not ready for everyone's use. And during that time, yes: some people can still try out the app, and yes, there is a technical barrier to do so, and that is totally part of the plan!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    I know you're actually serious, but this is coming off as satire. Did you read the OP?

    You can't make this shit up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    Yes I know it's satire but read the room. Several comments are saying basically the same thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago* (4 children)

    the releases section is in the same place every time, on every github repo everywhere. if you struggle to find it after the first time, then the skill check is working. come back when your basic pattern recognition is turned back on.

    if there is no binary release and you can't figure out how to proceed, the skill check is working and you probably shouldn't be fucking around with it until you know what you're doing.

    everything doesn't have to be for everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I didn't say that the releases section isn't in the same place every time, I'm saying that the download isn't always placed in the releases section. Sometimes it's in the description instead, sometimes it's somewhere else entirely, sometimes there is no download at all because they expect you to compile it.

    Don't put words into my mouth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment