496
Job allocation (thelemmy.club)
submitted 23 hours ago by to c/are_the_straights_ok@lemmy.blahaj.zone
43 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -6 points 14 hours ago (9 children)

I require you to use these cherries, as opposed to others

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 14 hours ago (8 children)

    I stuck to the topic of the post and didn't veer off. Anyone wants to start a different branch of the discussion, that's fine. But that's not what the comment I responded to did. They complained that I didn't expand on the topic.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [+] -11 points 14 hours ago (7 children)

    Ohhh providing examples that conflict with the narrative is complaining. Got it

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

    No, the dismissing tone of the message providing this contradiction is the problem. It does not have the form of simple nuances or counter-arguments. It has the form of an attack on the previous commenter's credibility.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

    If counter examples to highlight flaws in blanket statements are an attack to a person's credibility then idk what to tell you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

    My comment had an important follow up, posted only 7 minutes later, that makes your response to me quite silly.

    But even if I ignore my follow-up comment, beacause you maybe didn't even notice its existence... If you don't know how to read a three-sentences message without ignoring the first two-and-a-half, I don't know what to tell you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 4 hours ago

    I'm just saying that it isn't as single facet as the screen shot tries to make it. It is/was a product of a full cultural shift and it wasn't as arbitrary as that makes it out to be.

    I don't think trying to provide a more nuanced explanation qualifies as a blanket statement...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 11 hours ago

    And to be clear, about the core of these comments, form aside. I do not fully agree with the explanations given, while I recognise the reasonning as sound. I am just pretty sure there were and still are additional contributing factors, especially when not focusing on the USA. I do agree with thu counter examples. (Again, not with how these were given.)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent