untropvertimide comments on Job allocation

[–] untropvertimide@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

No, the dismissing tone of the message providing this contradiction is the problem. It does not have the form of simple nuances or counter-arguments. It has the form of an attack on the previous commenter's credibility.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] CheesyFingers@piefed.social 1 point 3 hours ago

If counter examples to highlight flaws in blanket statements are an attack to a person's credibility then idk what to tell you.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] untropvertimide@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 hours ago

And to be clear, about the core of these comments, form aside. I do not fully agree with the explanations given, while I recognise the reasonning as sound. I am just pretty sure there were and still are additional contributing factors, especially when not focusing on the USA. I do agree with thu counter examples. (Again, not with how these were given.)

permalink

fedilink

source

parent