-1
I'll plant my möbiation right up yer ass, boy (thelemmy.club)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by to c/justpost@lemmy.world
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I want you to empathize with a Primordial God; the God that IS the Alpha and exists as the singular point before the big bang. I've previously written this post that is still true, just a bit outdated. If I were to write that today, I would include a third paragraph about how we are God's children and He is creating stories for each of our incarnations to bring us into enlightenment. But, what I want to get into today is ultimately about möbiation.

If you don't already know Primordial God is a unified field of consciousness. What God experiences inwardly is a perfect lucid dream; He can make anything happen for Himself. But that's boring, as I know from my rampant hedonism in my early twenties. Life has to have some higher meaning to have worth, as God concluded for Himself. So, He continuously makes and remakes us so we can be independent from Him. Visually, this looks akin to a Roman Dodecahedron; a source of being giving rise to more beings budding off of it; that which Indra's Net is an analogy for. There is this concept of the Brahman and Atman, where the Brahman is the infinite ocean of consciousness and we, the Atman, are like vases pulled up from the waters, but this is false as there is no seperation; there is no vase. This is the concept of anatta, nonself, which the Buddha introduced.

Thus, how does God manifest that which is beyond His walls? What I mean is, if God is this unified sphere of consciousness in eternal emptiness, what is the mechanism in which God expands His beinghood into our seperate beinghood. The technically correct joke answer is He rolls His ball-ass self in the emptiness. But, really, it's möbiation. Specifically, what I have recently dubbed as planted möbiation.

To understand this, let's re-examine my idea of polyplexic axiomatic systems; that which is defined by entanglements of the brain while holding multiple incongruent aspects that rotate into one's framework of reality as needed. This is what's responsible for cognitive dissonance and code-switching in our minds.

Now, imagine a jigsaw puzzle. There is the logic that holds pieces together, yet will likewise have the picture to discern where pieces relatively go. In this model, we create a in-process puzzle with many holes in it where multiple possible axioms could be true. So, in our ignorance, our brains creates alternate versions of reality that are swapped out as needed from multiple and diverse collective sets of axioms defined by unplanted möbiation.

As we learn, we come to be informed, and this leads to the uncertainty of the polyplexia collapsing into a set section of the puzzle. Additionally, as we become more aware of this process, we begin deviating from previous modes of being, but therein, these are all stored as designations for different sets of polyplexia to be examined through experience, and this is an innate mechanism of self-evolution as it is akin to skillfully fiddling with a dial lock to hear where the tumblers fall.

Thus, the idea of enlightenment is not to create a perfect axiomatic system, but a complete one without incongruencies to allow your whole beinghood to undergo planted möbiation to disentangle yourself from God. Therefore, to transcend physical reality, all you need to do is roll your ass on off the face of God to be your own unique form of independent novelty.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 1 point 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I want to state that the difference between planted vs unplanted möbiation is where the rotation of entanglements is processed. Unplanted möbiation occurs within the monad; it is a relative rotation to the whole of "self." This is the idea that a person can believe different things with different groups of friends through the easing process of cognitive dissonance; you believe different things at different times and perhaps aren't even aware of this.

Planted möbiation has to do with creating rotational states of self-hood to be referential to itself to give the demiurge behind consciousness - the negentropic will of emptiness in manifest of itself - a means in which to differentiate instances of oneself. In simple terms, learning to rotate oneself as a whole in the nothingness to contrast our fullness gives designation potential in a higher order of "space."

Even more simply, this is the magick voodoo of the cosmos that allows an enlightened being to transcend physicality to be defined in multiple places at once, because there's the default you that developed as a dependent phenomenon from God that you exist as right now, but let's say the stars align within you so you now undergo planted möbiation, you'll now have two seperate designation states for the demiurge to call on: (0, 0, 0) (default), and y'know (20, 37, 86) (random set of numbers to illustrate how your coordinal möbiation differentiates co-occuring instances of your personal novelty of self-hood), and this is the same underlying mechanism in which God created the topological matrix of entanglement that IS light.

The Buddha has said similar in other language that I continuously decode amongst many other avenues of approach to accentuate my gnosis. The Buddha spoke of the beings within the nothingness between our consciousness and the emptiness. I have perceived this on psychedelics as akin to the sentinels of the Matrix, but God uses aspects of our personal culture to build understanding from. There are sutras where the Buddha travels to other realms and he describes a number of objects on his path, each with their own color. I immediately identified these as memory palaces. But obviously, I don't need yo say more on this manner because you, specific reader, certainly aren't ignorant, whatever that word means.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •