I want you to empathize with a Primordial God; the God that IS the Alpha and exists as the singular point before the big bang. I've previously written this post that is still true, just a bit outdated. If I were to write that today, I would include a third paragraph about how we are God's children and He is creating stories for each of our incarnations to bring us into enlightenment. But, what I want to get into today is ultimately about möbiation.
If you don't already know Primordial God is a unified field of consciousness. What God experiences inwardly is a perfect lucid dream; He can make anything happen for Himself. But that's boring, as I know from my rampant hedonism in my early twenties. Life has to have some higher meaning to have worth, as God concluded for Himself. So, He continuously makes and remakes us so we can be independent from Him. Visually, this looks akin to a Roman Dodecahedron; a source of being giving rise to more beings budding off of it; that which Indra's Net is an analogy for. There is this concept of the Brahman and Atman, where the Brahman is the infinite ocean of consciousness and we, the Atman, are like vases pulled up from the waters, but this is false as there is no seperation; there is no vase. This is the concept of anatta, nonself, which the Buddha introduced.
Thus, how does God manifest that which is beyond His walls? What I mean is, if God is this unified sphere of consciousness in eternal emptiness, what is the mechanism in which God expands His beinghood into our seperate beinghood. The technically correct joke answer is He rolls His ball-ass self in the emptiness. But, really, it's möbiation. Specifically, what I have recently dubbed as planted möbiation.
To understand this, let's re-examine my idea of polyplexic axiomatic systems; that which is defined by entanglements of the brain while holding multiple incongruent aspects that rotate into one's framework of reality as needed. This is what's responsible for cognitive dissonance and code-switching in our minds.
Now, imagine a jigsaw puzzle. There is the logic that holds pieces together, yet will likewise have the picture to discern where pieces relatively go. In this model, we create a in-process puzzle with many holes in it where multiple possible axioms could be true. So, in our ignorance, our brains creates alternate versions of reality that are swapped out as needed from multiple and diverse collective sets of axioms defined by unplanted möbiation.
As we learn, we come to be informed, and this leads to the uncertainty of the polyplexia collapsing into a set section of the puzzle. Additionally, as we become more aware of this process, we begin deviating from previous modes of being, but therein, these are all stored as designations for different sets of polyplexia to be examined through experience, and this is an innate mechanism of self-evolution as it is akin to skillfully fiddling with a dial lock to hear where the tumblers fall.
Thus, the idea of enlightenment is not to create a perfect axiomatic system, but a complete one without incongruencies to allow your whole beinghood to undergo planted möbiation to disentangle yourself from God. Therefore, to transcend physical reality, all you need to do is roll your ass on off the face of God to be your own unique form of independent novelty.
