you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 4 days ago (3 children)

maybe there's context i'm missing but i am told that this is par for the course with sakai. it smacks of american exceptionalism of the kind that apparently got jay lovestone expelled from the cpusa (but he would later be welcomed with open arms by the cia). of course the us has a proletariat and it's our (amerikkkan left) failure that our movements suck. imperialism creates opportunism, of course. but there is a proletariat to organize and the communists in this country still have to act, just like the communists in every other country.

it's convenient for the opportunists in our movements to say that because imperialism has bought off our movements, the people of the usa have zero revolutionary potential. the obvious conclusion then becomes that we don't need to learn from our failures, that we don't even need to organize, that we can do nothing but trotskyist newspaper clubs and maoist adventurists while we wait for the global south to liberate us. this is, of course, nonsense.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago* (1 child)

    The American left is the reason why the movements suck?

    Not… you know? The mass incarceration, demonization, and assassination of leftist figures by apparati of the state at the behest of the capitalist class?

    I do agree however that the text is grimly defeatist, and almost useless in determining what one should do to improve things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • The mass incarceration, demonization, and assassination of leftist figures by apparati of the state at the behest of the capitalist class?

    that's table stakes. it comes with the turf. every communist movement starts out facing these problems. stalin famously had a printing press in a tunnel under a well in a backyard in tblisi, until the tzar figured it out, dynamited the printing room, and burned down the house. the first task of any serious revolutionary movement is to competently manage these risks. also, it helps not to self-sabotage like many of the current movements.

  • source
  • parent
  • Maybe living in kkklanada (sorry lol) takes the sting off a bit (although I understand this text is about us too) and maybe I'm reading the text with rose-coloured glasses and he's literally telling us it's hopeless but I don't see it that way. I haven't been exposed to the criticisms you mention so I can't respond to them in a meaningful way.

    I would encourage those who are able to engage with the text, sit with it, and think of it as highlighting practical challenges in north america as an aid to the local movements rather than a condemnation of them.

  • source
  • parent