Also I disagree with that label. I'm taking the radical position that... it's probably fine. It largely works, and people can do stuff with it. Staying mad about it is poorly justified and bad for your health. It's just a chatbot. Make your peace.

Meanwhile the insistence that 'AI [thing] isn't [thing]!' gets shakier and fuzzier, but no less loudly confident. An AI cartoon isn't a drawing, sure. But it is an image conveying someone's idea. AI music is still a song, by any definition. It's usually well within western music theory. AI reverse engineering has demonstrably produced byte-for-byte identical results, and some folks still insist it doesn't count, somehow. What is anyone supposed to say to that? It's an absurd denial framed like philosophy. A counter-poke and saying 'relax' do not make someone a delusional cultist.

You have to be able to understand disagreement in terms besides an opposite extreme.