▲ 32 ▼ Linus Torvalds Working On A Hefty Linux Kernel Improvement With Claude Code (www.phoronix.com) submitted 12 hours ago by cm0002@lemy.lol to c/linux@programming.dev 35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] mrbigmouth502@piefed.zip 9 points 11 hours ago (5 children) I'd love to see a pre-AI fork of the Linux kernel. permalink fedilink source hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 point 14 minutes ago Okay, that was always an option. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MangoCats@feddit.it 4 points 1 hour ago Be the change you seek in the world. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 5 points 6 hours ago (1 child) I think some of the BSDs have no AI clauses. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] heliotrope@slrpnk.net 5 points 5 hours ago I ran it all through Slopscore and consulted open-slopware, and here are the results: ⬛ Linux has at least 2,274 slop commits, to date. 🟧 FreeBSD has at least 53 slop commits, including some from Anthropic themselves. 🟨 OpenBSD and NetBSD have a couple of slop commits, but nothing colossal. NetBSD also requires any AI-generated code to be signed off by the core maintainers. 🟨 DragonFly BSD has at least three slop commits. 🟥 MidnightBSD has at least 292 slop commits. ⬛ NextBSD is entirely vibecoded. 🟩 MirBSD has an anti-AI policy, but only supports i386 and SPARC, and is currently unusable anyway. 🟩 HyperbolaBSD has an anti-AI policy, but hasn't been released yet (they're still a Linux-libre distro). 🟩 CoffeeBSD is a slop-free fork of FreeBSD, but has had no commits since it was forked. permalink fedilink source parent [–] endofline@lemmy.ca 11 points 9 hours ago You can do it always permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 point 14 minutes ago Okay, that was always an option. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 4 points 1 hour ago Be the change you seek in the world. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 5 points 6 hours ago (1 child) I think some of the BSDs have no AI clauses. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] heliotrope@slrpnk.net 5 points 5 hours ago I ran it all through Slopscore and consulted open-slopware, and here are the results: ⬛ Linux has at least 2,274 slop commits, to date. 🟧 FreeBSD has at least 53 slop commits, including some from Anthropic themselves. 🟨 OpenBSD and NetBSD have a couple of slop commits, but nothing colossal. NetBSD also requires any AI-generated code to be signed off by the core maintainers. 🟨 DragonFly BSD has at least three slop commits. 🟥 MidnightBSD has at least 292 slop commits. ⬛ NextBSD is entirely vibecoded. 🟩 MirBSD has an anti-AI policy, but only supports i386 and SPARC, and is currently unusable anyway. 🟩 HyperbolaBSD has an anti-AI policy, but hasn't been released yet (they're still a Linux-libre distro). 🟩 CoffeeBSD is a slop-free fork of FreeBSD, but has had no commits since it was forked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] heliotrope@slrpnk.net 5 points 5 hours ago I ran it all through Slopscore and consulted open-slopware, and here are the results: ⬛ Linux has at least 2,274 slop commits, to date. 🟧 FreeBSD has at least 53 slop commits, including some from Anthropic themselves. 🟨 OpenBSD and NetBSD have a couple of slop commits, but nothing colossal. NetBSD also requires any AI-generated code to be signed off by the core maintainers. 🟨 DragonFly BSD has at least three slop commits. 🟥 MidnightBSD has at least 292 slop commits. ⬛ NextBSD is entirely vibecoded. 🟩 MirBSD has an anti-AI policy, but only supports i386 and SPARC, and is currently unusable anyway. 🟩 HyperbolaBSD has an anti-AI policy, but hasn't been released yet (they're still a Linux-libre distro). 🟩 CoffeeBSD is a slop-free fork of FreeBSD, but has had no commits since it was forked. permalink fedilink source parent