you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 14 hours ago* (10 children)

Maybe, but im convinced it will work just like any other technology that has arrived before it.

Currently we are in the hype stage where so called experts are warning the technology can kill humanity and other silly things.

But this will pass. The technology will continue to be very useful to both companies and individuals and because of this, pricing will adapt. This means less price for the consumers as number of users and competition goes up.

We will have a society where Ai is used to take our orders, find our information, do a lot of office job tasks. It will become just as common everywhere as screens and phones.

And people say it's not going to be profitable? That's extreamly improbable. Every technology that is used by everyone is highly profitable, it's just a matter of which companies will win the market and which won't.

There won't be any bubble popping because it's not a bubble. It's a new technology, like phones and laptops once were too. I had one of the first smart phones actually and I watched that market explode over the coming decade, with every human buying a smart phone. That market is now stagnated, more of less. But Ai has only just begun.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 hours ago (8 children)

    The problem is not that it’s a useful tool for some applications. The problem is the insane amount of money thrown at this which is not possible to repay unless their product achieves runaway AGI and can actually cause these doomsday scenarios. They have no path to profitability. Like, none.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 hours ago* (7 children)

    These companies are so rich and already have existing revenue in billions, so even if the Ai bet doesn't work out, they can simply pay off their debt using their ordinary revenue.

    It would disappoint the stock market, sure, but I doubt that it would create anything more problematic than maybe a 20% drop in the stock, temporarily. And that would be because investors would know that the future will not contain the promised profits. But the companies would still be fine, still be able to pay their debts, and still be able to run their business as usual.

    Its not like in dot com where companies without revenue got to borrow tons of money they could never pay back.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

    Its not like in dot com where companies without revenue got to borrow tons of money they could never pay back.

    It’s exactly that, but much worse. These companies do not make money. They lose tons of money every quarter. They have revenue but it doesn’t even cover their operations cost. But that’s not even the expensive part; training new models is hideously pricey and that will not change. And they must keep training new models lest they “fall behind” in this race to the bottom. OpenAI owes a Trillion and a half dollars to their investors. They have at least a trillion in obligations to compute providers. They keep taking more investor money, most recently with SoftBank who sold junk bonds to raise it.

    Not to worry, OpenAI may lose money on every sale, but they make up for it in volume!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 hours ago (4 children)

    It's true that Google (just took some example to check) is spending more money on investments than they are earning back right now. But they have an enormous pile of money still.

    Google spent 45 billion on infrastructure investments in Q2 and they made 41 billion in profits. So they made a loss of 4 billion that quarter.

    But since they have 242 billion in available money, it really isnt a big deal. It's pretty much the same as you or me spending more money that we earn in our monthly salary, and take it from our savings.

    But sure, I can see how it makes people nervous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 hours ago* (3 children)

    You're talking about Google. I'm talking about OpenAI, Anthropic, and to a certain extent Meta. Sure, Google has plenty of money and even they managed to lose some on this deal. The AI economy collapse will ding Google but it will be existential to many of the largest companies in the US market. Several trillion dollars in value will be wiped out of existence. You seem very nonchalant about this; what do you think will happen to OpenAI and Anthropic when the truth of their grift is fully exposed and they go tits-up? What of Oracle who has spent all their money speculatively building data centers? What about Nvidia who sells the shovels in this gold rush? What about Meta who is still paying for their idiotic "Metaverse" and has now gone whole-hog into the AI race, dropping gobs of money in an attempt to "catch up"? What about SpaceXAi or whatever the fuck they're called now, who went public in order to prop up the loser companies they had to gobble up while they were failing?

    edit I'm not even getting into the circular deals and outright grift that's happening in broad daylight.

    Google may be the last man standing, but it will be atop a pile of rubble.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 hours ago* (2 children)

    I guess I am a bit nonchalant yeah. Maybe I dont fully understand the impact for the world if these companies would lose 50% of their value in the stock market. It seems to me that it would affect people's savings, sure. But unless you went all-in on those companies, it shouldn't wipe anyone out completely. Index funds takes a hit, maybe 20% drop? And in a year it's back where it was?

    Perhaps I do actually not understand the consequences. What would happen? How would it cause something major like a depression?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 hours ago* (1 child)

    Yeah, at least a major recession but I think a depression is probable. Were you around for the dot-com crash? I was, and the job loss was everywhere, not just in tech. It was a scary and shitty time. Lots of people lost everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago

    I was but too young to suffer. I was still in university when it happened. Also I'm in Sweden so it was much less of an effect here compared to America. I believe you, must have been horrible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 hours ago*

    As how my local AI would put it, "I would like to gently push back":

    There is an AI bubble. Just as the Dotcom Bubble, it won't kill the technology nor slow advancement - it simply selects against companies that are not fiscally responsible or intelligent about their agenda.

  • source
  • parent