▲ 418 ▼ Mac Users Are Nuking Every Trace of Apple AI on Their Machines: Sayonara useless AI features, and hello disk space. (futurism.com) submitted 20 hours ago by eicker@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] yestalgia@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago (5 children) I think you mean Tim Apple permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 6 hours ago Ah woops you beat me to it! permalink fedilink source parent [–] f314@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago (3 children) It’s John Apple now! (Tim Cook resigned. John Ternus is the current CEO of Apple) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Bryllyg@quokk.au 8 points 13 hours ago (2 children) What if it's a Dread Pirate Roberts situation, and every subsequent Apple CEO automatically becomes "Tim Apple"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 child) Then they should definitely all be Steve Apple. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 point 9 hours ago No, for two reasons. First, there are already two Steve Apples, from the same time, no less. Second, because we don't really want one of those Steves back. Great marketer, shit person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 6 hours ago Ah woops you beat me to it! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] f314@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago (3 children) It’s John Apple now! (Tim Cook resigned. John Ternus is the current CEO of Apple) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Bryllyg@quokk.au 8 points 13 hours ago (2 children) What if it's a Dread Pirate Roberts situation, and every subsequent Apple CEO automatically becomes "Tim Apple"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 child) Then they should definitely all be Steve Apple. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 point 9 hours ago No, for two reasons. First, there are already two Steve Apples, from the same time, no less. Second, because we don't really want one of those Steves back. Great marketer, shit person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bryllyg@quokk.au 8 points 13 hours ago (2 children) What if it's a Dread Pirate Roberts situation, and every subsequent Apple CEO automatically becomes "Tim Apple"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 child) Then they should definitely all be Steve Apple. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 point 9 hours ago No, for two reasons. First, there are already two Steve Apples, from the same time, no less. Second, because we don't really want one of those Steves back. Great marketer, shit person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 child) Then they should definitely all be Steve Apple. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 point 9 hours ago No, for two reasons. First, there are already two Steve Apples, from the same time, no less. Second, because we don't really want one of those Steves back. Great marketer, shit person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 point 9 hours ago No, for two reasons. First, there are already two Steve Apples, from the same time, no less. Second, because we don't really want one of those Steves back. Great marketer, shit person. permalink fedilink source parent