▲ 232 ▼ Don’t Want to Spend Time With Your Kids? Train an AI Voice Model of Yourself to Read Them Bedtime Stories: Parent-child bonding time isn't so sacred that it can't be optimized with AI. (futurism.com) submitted 2 days ago by eicker@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 90 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] halfapage@lemmy.world 84 points 2 days ago (11 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 81 points 2 days ago Simpsons Futurama did it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (8 children) Hell, why even choose to live? Humans are so inefficient. Just stop existing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 days ago (6 children) whats extra funny about that statement is humans are insanely efficient permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 2 days ago (5 children) Is that even true? That might only be in relation to other animals, not to robots. Humans do a lot of useless things like fart and laugh. Robots don't. Even from an energy perspective, if a human takes 2,000 kilocalories to go about their day, that's 8,400,000 joules or 2.3 kWh. A laptop battery is around 75 Wh, so that's around 30 laptop batteries for 16 hours of activity, many of which might just be sitting down at a desk to think. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago (4 children) a laptop isnt capable of even a teeny tiny baby fraction of what a human brain can do. the only thing a laptop can do better than a human is calculating and data recall. the entire reason we made computers was to augment those weaknesses in our minds, because theyre so useful. but in terms of data processing, learning, prediction, planning, a laptop is basically an abacus being compared to a supercomputer, and thats being extremely generous to the abacus. human brains have had billions of years of evolution demanding more performant brains under severe energy restrictions. yeah we're way way way more efficient than any computer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 day ago (3 children) This is a post about AI. While a computer will probably not in the near future be able to simulate a human brain fully, artificial intelligence models are getting scarily close to being able to pretend to do everything that a human can do. That's what I was getting at. But of course, one should still not lose track of the overall point here that replacing the human experience with AI is completely missing the plot, even if it is "more efficient". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 19 hours ago (2 children) Except they run on Megawatts and we on like a handful of watts... That's efficiency! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 17 hours ago (1 child) Megawatts to serve hundreds of thousands of users. The reason AI data centres are so wasteful with electricity is because a lot of the usage is not out towards anything useful but just wasted on things like generating Google Search summaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 9 hours ago It was an example, the brain is wildly more efficient than any computer today. That's just how it is. permalink fedilink source parent [+] halfapage@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] oce@jlai.lu 5 points 2 days ago Can we opt to "live" in the Matrix? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 81 points 2 days ago Simpsons Futurama did it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (8 children) Hell, why even choose to live? Humans are so inefficient. Just stop existing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 days ago (6 children) whats extra funny about that statement is humans are insanely efficient permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 2 days ago (5 children) Is that even true? That might only be in relation to other animals, not to robots. Humans do a lot of useless things like fart and laugh. Robots don't. Even from an energy perspective, if a human takes 2,000 kilocalories to go about their day, that's 8,400,000 joules or 2.3 kWh. A laptop battery is around 75 Wh, so that's around 30 laptop batteries for 16 hours of activity, many of which might just be sitting down at a desk to think. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago (4 children) a laptop isnt capable of even a teeny tiny baby fraction of what a human brain can do. the only thing a laptop can do better than a human is calculating and data recall. the entire reason we made computers was to augment those weaknesses in our minds, because theyre so useful. but in terms of data processing, learning, prediction, planning, a laptop is basically an abacus being compared to a supercomputer, and thats being extremely generous to the abacus. human brains have had billions of years of evolution demanding more performant brains under severe energy restrictions. yeah we're way way way more efficient than any computer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 day ago (3 children) This is a post about AI. While a computer will probably not in the near future be able to simulate a human brain fully, artificial intelligence models are getting scarily close to being able to pretend to do everything that a human can do. That's what I was getting at. But of course, one should still not lose track of the overall point here that replacing the human experience with AI is completely missing the plot, even if it is "more efficient". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 19 hours ago (2 children) Except they run on Megawatts and we on like a handful of watts... That's efficiency! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 17 hours ago (1 child) Megawatts to serve hundreds of thousands of users. The reason AI data centres are so wasteful with electricity is because a lot of the usage is not out towards anything useful but just wasted on things like generating Google Search summaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 9 hours ago It was an example, the brain is wildly more efficient than any computer today. That's just how it is. permalink fedilink source parent [+] halfapage@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 days ago (6 children) whats extra funny about that statement is humans are insanely efficient permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 2 days ago (5 children) Is that even true? That might only be in relation to other animals, not to robots. Humans do a lot of useless things like fart and laugh. Robots don't. Even from an energy perspective, if a human takes 2,000 kilocalories to go about their day, that's 8,400,000 joules or 2.3 kWh. A laptop battery is around 75 Wh, so that's around 30 laptop batteries for 16 hours of activity, many of which might just be sitting down at a desk to think. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago (4 children) a laptop isnt capable of even a teeny tiny baby fraction of what a human brain can do. the only thing a laptop can do better than a human is calculating and data recall. the entire reason we made computers was to augment those weaknesses in our minds, because theyre so useful. but in terms of data processing, learning, prediction, planning, a laptop is basically an abacus being compared to a supercomputer, and thats being extremely generous to the abacus. human brains have had billions of years of evolution demanding more performant brains under severe energy restrictions. yeah we're way way way more efficient than any computer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 day ago (3 children) This is a post about AI. While a computer will probably not in the near future be able to simulate a human brain fully, artificial intelligence models are getting scarily close to being able to pretend to do everything that a human can do. That's what I was getting at. But of course, one should still not lose track of the overall point here that replacing the human experience with AI is completely missing the plot, even if it is "more efficient". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 19 hours ago (2 children) Except they run on Megawatts and we on like a handful of watts... That's efficiency! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 17 hours ago (1 child) Megawatts to serve hundreds of thousands of users. The reason AI data centres are so wasteful with electricity is because a lot of the usage is not out towards anything useful but just wasted on things like generating Google Search summaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 9 hours ago It was an example, the brain is wildly more efficient than any computer today. That's just how it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 2 days ago (5 children) Is that even true? That might only be in relation to other animals, not to robots. Humans do a lot of useless things like fart and laugh. Robots don't. Even from an energy perspective, if a human takes 2,000 kilocalories to go about their day, that's 8,400,000 joules or 2.3 kWh. A laptop battery is around 75 Wh, so that's around 30 laptop batteries for 16 hours of activity, many of which might just be sitting down at a desk to think. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago (4 children) a laptop isnt capable of even a teeny tiny baby fraction of what a human brain can do. the only thing a laptop can do better than a human is calculating and data recall. the entire reason we made computers was to augment those weaknesses in our minds, because theyre so useful. but in terms of data processing, learning, prediction, planning, a laptop is basically an abacus being compared to a supercomputer, and thats being extremely generous to the abacus. human brains have had billions of years of evolution demanding more performant brains under severe energy restrictions. yeah we're way way way more efficient than any computer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 day ago (3 children) This is a post about AI. While a computer will probably not in the near future be able to simulate a human brain fully, artificial intelligence models are getting scarily close to being able to pretend to do everything that a human can do. That's what I was getting at. But of course, one should still not lose track of the overall point here that replacing the human experience with AI is completely missing the plot, even if it is "more efficient". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 19 hours ago (2 children) Except they run on Megawatts and we on like a handful of watts... That's efficiency! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 17 hours ago (1 child) Megawatts to serve hundreds of thousands of users. The reason AI data centres are so wasteful with electricity is because a lot of the usage is not out towards anything useful but just wasted on things like generating Google Search summaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 9 hours ago It was an example, the brain is wildly more efficient than any computer today. That's just how it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago (4 children) a laptop isnt capable of even a teeny tiny baby fraction of what a human brain can do. the only thing a laptop can do better than a human is calculating and data recall. the entire reason we made computers was to augment those weaknesses in our minds, because theyre so useful. but in terms of data processing, learning, prediction, planning, a laptop is basically an abacus being compared to a supercomputer, and thats being extremely generous to the abacus. human brains have had billions of years of evolution demanding more performant brains under severe energy restrictions. yeah we're way way way more efficient than any computer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 day ago (3 children) This is a post about AI. While a computer will probably not in the near future be able to simulate a human brain fully, artificial intelligence models are getting scarily close to being able to pretend to do everything that a human can do. That's what I was getting at. But of course, one should still not lose track of the overall point here that replacing the human experience with AI is completely missing the plot, even if it is "more efficient". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 19 hours ago (2 children) Except they run on Megawatts and we on like a handful of watts... That's efficiency! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 17 hours ago (1 child) Megawatts to serve hundreds of thousands of users. The reason AI data centres are so wasteful with electricity is because a lot of the usage is not out towards anything useful but just wasted on things like generating Google Search summaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 9 hours ago It was an example, the brain is wildly more efficient than any computer today. That's just how it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 1 day ago (3 children) This is a post about AI. While a computer will probably not in the near future be able to simulate a human brain fully, artificial intelligence models are getting scarily close to being able to pretend to do everything that a human can do. That's what I was getting at. But of course, one should still not lose track of the overall point here that replacing the human experience with AI is completely missing the plot, even if it is "more efficient". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 19 hours ago (2 children) Except they run on Megawatts and we on like a handful of watts... That's efficiency! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 17 hours ago (1 child) Megawatts to serve hundreds of thousands of users. The reason AI data centres are so wasteful with electricity is because a lot of the usage is not out towards anything useful but just wasted on things like generating Google Search summaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 9 hours ago It was an example, the brain is wildly more efficient than any computer today. That's just how it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 19 hours ago (2 children) Except they run on Megawatts and we on like a handful of watts... That's efficiency! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 17 hours ago (1 child) Megawatts to serve hundreds of thousands of users. The reason AI data centres are so wasteful with electricity is because a lot of the usage is not out towards anything useful but just wasted on things like generating Google Search summaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 9 hours ago It was an example, the brain is wildly more efficient than any computer today. That's just how it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 point 17 hours ago (1 child) Megawatts to serve hundreds of thousands of users. The reason AI data centres are so wasteful with electricity is because a lot of the usage is not out towards anything useful but just wasted on things like generating Google Search summaries. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 9 hours ago It was an example, the brain is wildly more efficient than any computer today. That's just how it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 9 hours ago It was an example, the brain is wildly more efficient than any computer today. That's just how it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] oce@jlai.lu 5 points 2 days ago Can we opt to "live" in the Matrix? permalink fedilink source parent