We all want the problems solved, right? Is there a wrong way to solve them?

Science is not mainly about solving problems (that would be engineering for example).

But more specifically to your question:

There are many wrong ways of doing scientific work, and what current AI does is one of them: reading it all, rephrasing it all a little and then already declare everything as done & good, even when it isn't.

A scientist needs proof, and peer reviews, etc. before the work can be called good.

Never forget AI isn't creating really new things, it can only chew up and spit out what has been there before. This is especially true in science.