I replied to someone saying that the USSR defeated the Nazis saying that it was a group effort. Got into an argument and called a Nazi repeatedly because "I was mad that the USSR defeated the Nazis and hated them for it" which is ridiculous. This isn't the first time that's happened on Lemmy. What's up with that?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 33 points 1 week ago* (5 children)

Granted the Romanian communist experiment was particularly subpar iirc

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Any good sources to read on this? I would like to know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    Unfortunately it is just something I have been told by other comrades. I did some digging to see if I could find anything for you but most of what I could find was too out of date and obviously ideological to recommend. There could be something of value in "The Political Economy of Romanian Socialism" by William E. Crowther but the introduction didn't give me an abundance of hope. The book was published by Praeger (connection to Dennis uncertain) in 1988 which is known for publishing books by Eastern Bloc dissidents. It's also, seemingly, Crowther's only book.

    However, the introduction, while reeking of capitalist ideology, is genuinely well written and display critical thinking rooted in an obvious knowledge of social science. It's not a super long book and its on Anna's Archive if you're very curious. It could also cite some decent sources within it.

    I also found a book called The Socialist Republic of Rumania by Stephen Fischer-Galati but it was published in 1969 and even the blurb of Annas-archive was so abysmal I wrote it off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Nah, that's BS, at least in economic terms. Romania was an entirely agrarian land prior to communism, and by the 1980s it was an industrialized country with free healthcare, free education, socialized housing and guaranteed employment, with very healthy economic growth all throughout. After the dismantling of socialism in Romania, people suffered immensely and they've been in demographic catastrophe for the past 35 years

    Most of the complaints about socialist Romania boil down to "Ceaucescu wasn't charismatic enough", which fair enough, but what came after is much, much worse. I have yet to hear someone coherently tell me why the socialist experiment in Romania wasn't successful, and it would seem most Romanians agree, with 56% of them saying socialism was good for Romania even after a third of a century of anticommunist propaganda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago*

    Never meant to imply it was bad or somehow worse than capitalism. The way it was presented to me was more that it wasn't as good as many other socialist experiments and had some particularly crummy policies here and there

  • source
  • parent