The Supreme Court is rebuffing an appeal from a Michigan woman fighting a school district’s ban on shirts with the phrase “Let’s Go Brandon,” a jab at then-President Joe Biden with a coded reference to profanity.

The mother of two boys says their First Amendment rights were violated when they were told to take off the sweatshirts she bought them for Christmas in 2022.

A lower court disagreed, finding that the veiled vulgarity of the phrase, which functions as a stand-in for “F-— Joe Biden,” allows schools to ban it.

The woman’s attorneys argued that the decision wrongly gives school officials wide latitude to squelch political speech based on their personal ideas of what is vulgar. The phrase itself doesn’t contain any swear words or sexual implications, they said.

The school district urged the justices to reject the case, arguing that messages with lewd implications have no place in school, even if they touch on political topics. There has been evidence that some students wore clothing that read “Make America Great Again” or had messages supporting President Donald Trump, a Republican who lost the 2020 election to Biden, a Democrat.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 4 days ago* (13 children)

I don't know man. There's a lot of 7-12 grade kids that are far right. Or part of that toxic manosphere

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 days ago (8 children)

    Yeah they also can't vote yet and by voting age the statistics are and have been for like a hundred or so years shifted left towards 60 and back right after that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 days ago* (7 children)

    But there's a lot of sympathy in college campus for things like turning point. Pre 2014 those people would have been ran off campus and sometimes were. Now you don't see that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 4 days ago (5 children)

    Running them off campus is how we got here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    Don't care. They should always be afraid

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    That may well be true but let them speak.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    Because to the naïve, far-right nonsense feels edgy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    And I don't get that. To me being against wealth, nuclear family, religion is the non conformist route

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    I suspect there has to be a lot of indoctrination involved. Note how these edgelords are also deeply religious, or at least claim to be (not getting into how they do or don't actually follow the tenets of their religion).

    Musk (edgelord extraordinaire) said publically in a recent post that he just couldn't bring himself to attack cops in a video game. I guess violent video games are a problem again. It's all the same tired conservative nonsense but it's been sold to a generation that doesn't have the backstory.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment