you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -9 points 4 days ago (9 children)

EVERY source is "influenced," which is why it's so important to diversify your sources to get a better picture of the full story. Wikipedia may not be perfect, but it does a hell of a job trying to be as impartial as is possible when humans are involved. If you still don't trust them, that's fine - but don't trust your preferred side to give you the full story, either - or not try to slant the story towards propaganda to take advantage of confirmation bias for their own purposes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 days ago (4 children)

    as impartial as is possible when humans are involved

    Who counts as "humans" in this sentence?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    Apparently not you, in all your glorious perfection.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 days ago (3 children)
  • [–] -4 points 4 days ago* (2 children)

    Wow. Such an impressive intellectual "rebuttal" - incredibly well researched, and thoughtful.

    🙄 Pathetic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments