Former Conservative prime minister Stephen Harper cautioned against the prospect of Alberta separation in a column Friday, writing that even voting just to "send a message" would represent a fraught approach.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wanting more autonomy for Alberta is not the same as wanting Alberta to leave Canada. The UCP is absolutely a separatist party. The CPC, while absolutely going full MAGA, is not. And I've not seen any actual evidence yet that Harper falls in either camp. Happy to be corrected, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 15 hours ago* (1 child)

    Again, it's what Harper doesn't say that tarnishes him. He's not a dumb person and definitely sees through the separatist 🐂💩.

    But does he say anything like that? No. Instead we get the weak and insipid headline statement.

    Here's a rundown of the truly flawed arguments made by the separatists: https://dougaldlamont.substack.com/p/reminder-not-one-of-the-free-alberta?publication_id=2010569&post_id=218443307

    He could call them out on any of these issues, but does he? Instead he validates the Alberta vs Ottawa framing that has no basis in truth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 hours ago

    Does the Quebec versus Canada framing also have no basis in truth? Was Canada wrong for allowing Quebec to have the autonomy it currently has? Because that's what Harper's spent years arguing for, including with his Alberta firewall letter addressed to Alberta's at the time not separatist Premier. I mean, I personally don't think Quebec should be allowed to have and run its own pension plan, but it does. If that's something Alberta's demanding, can we really be surprised?

  • source
  • parent