Inspired by @unicorn@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Template

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 13 hours ago (10 children)

I can’t understand how people think this was the right move. It was obviously murder. Tuvix begged and pleaded for his life.

He was a good crewmate, a comfort to some, and the only bad thing he did was remind people of a tragedy that wasn’t his fault.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 12 hours ago (8 children)

    So 2 things with it, first out of universe in the real world, the actors have contracts that need to be upheld, simply because of that the ending of that episode had to happen that way. It would have been fascinating to get to do a longer exploration of this character but the reality of producing a TV show is that contracts have to be honored, amd just like Tuvix, neither choice is really "the right choice" just different ones. Is serving an interesting narrative more important? Is honoring the real lives and work contracts of the actors more important?

    The second, is that the episode clearly does heavily weigh on the decision that needed to be made, sacrifice the existence of 2 of the crew for a new one, or sacrifice the existence of this one for the 2 crew mates, the episode never made any comment which was the right choice, only that the choice had to be made one way or the other. Hell even The EMH explicitly states he will not take Tuvix's life by beginning the separation. The episode makes no mistake, what Janeway is choosing to do is essentially murder, and only asks us whether the murder of 1 is worth saving 2.

    At the end of the day this this episode testing the conculsion of Measure of a Man in the no win decision of the Kobayashi Maru and the logic of irradiated warp engine room from Wrath of Khan. I think its a brilliant moral philosophy episode because there is no good decision, there is no right answer, there is no star fleet protocol that can handle tbis and there is no "bounce a particle beam off the main deflector dish" treknobabble to magically solve the problem. Just the decision of who's lives to change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 hours ago

    Just to add, but Janeway's conclusion wasn't even about the number of lives. It was that the odds of the entire ship surviving were a lot lower without both of the original 2. (Actually, without Tuvok...)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago (1 child)

    As for contracts, can’t the writers write out a character if they choose to do so, and if the actor is still under contract, the actor still gets paid, but doesn’t appear on screen?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 hours ago

    In theory, maybe? But contracts for actors partially is to guarantee they'll have work to do and for executive producers to get value out of the actor. Actors tend to want to act and producers want the actors they're paying to actually act and then to replace two of them with another character kn the ensemble is another contract that needs to be drawn up and is another person to pay.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 12 hours ago (1 child)

    Copy-paste in the transporter and get all 3, no charge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 hours ago

    Maybe? But transporter cloning accidents are wildly unpredictable, there's a reason the safety measures are supposed to prevent cloning from happening. Kirk got split into his dominant and passive sides, Riker got split into identical clones, but because one was abandoned on Nervala IV and went through a wildly different lifepath.

    There's also no guarantee how the process has to happen, for example can you get 2 incomplete clones from 1 person and still preserve the original? Or do you have to create a complete clone and then do a split clone? Now were back in the same moral situation, which clone do we essentially murder to bring back Tuvok and Neelix?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

    I don't know, I do agree the episode did not sugar coat it, but I still came out of the episode finding it hard to watch and respect any of the crew members who just watched and let it happen. I had to take a break for a while after that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 hours ago (1 child)

    It being hard to watch is exactly why I love this episode so much, it highlights that with all the hope and optimism and ideals and protocols, sometimes there are situations that there is no right answer. Its the purest essence of the Kobayashi Maru test.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment