▲ 2016 ▼ The EU has finally won this one! (feddit.de) submitted 3 years ago by Oiconomia@feddit.de to c/memes@lemmy.ml 376 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 3 years ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (17 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 21 points 3 years ago (7 children) It is reversible and consistent consistent in what? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] cujo@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 years ago (2 children) Consistent in frying pins and fraying cables. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fuzzypyro@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) I worked cellular retail for 8 years I’ve never really seen fried pins on iPhones. The frayed cables are pretty much inevitable especially if it is apples first party cables. Shockingly I have had contamination in usbc ports though. It caused several devices of mine to no longer charge due to corrosion. Still not sure what exactly caused it but I suppose it was juice from a vape that leaked into the connector. Basically fried my laptop c ports, my iPads port and my pixel’s port. I still think the move to c was pretty necessary. Only complaint is cables that have contaminants can easily travel between devices now. Other than that the protocol support is all over the place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cujo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago Everyone I know who uses an iPhone has had fried pins on the cable, not necessarily on their device. No one I know personally has had any issues with USB-C. Though both experiences are anecdotal, I think we can take this away from our conversation at least: no cable design is perfect. Lol! permalink fedilink source parent [+] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Mini-USB wasn't very common. Micro-USB was common. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 9 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Amilo159@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Consistent in connecting /charging on first try, compared to micro usb. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Phrodo_00@lemmy.world 15 points 3 years ago (8 children) Lightning's data transfer and charging are subpar, although I'm not sure if Apple is implementing PD fast charging on the new iPhone either. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] HRDS_654@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (6 children) They are not, unless you get the pro as far as I have seen/heard. The regular iPhone is artificially limited to USB 2.0 speeds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago It is not artificially limited. It’s using the board from last year’s Pro model. It doesn’t have a USB3 interface. permalink fedilink source parent [–] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 years ago USB 2.0 vs. 3.0 data has nothing to do with USB PD charging wattage. permalink fedilink source parent [–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) The Pro still doesn't have PD charging. When they go portless (I'm guessing next year or 2) they don't want people bitching that the charging is slower, so they're not going to support wired charging that's faster than wireless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 years ago The same law that forces standardised cable by the EU also forces Apple to not go portless, since it needs a standardised port on the device that can be used to charge. permalink fedilink source parent [–] clutchmatic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago This is to force users to use cloud solutions and lock users in the apple ecosystem permalink fedilink source parent [+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [+] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 9 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 21 points 3 years ago (7 children) It is reversible and consistent consistent in what? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] cujo@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 years ago (2 children) Consistent in frying pins and fraying cables. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fuzzypyro@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) I worked cellular retail for 8 years I’ve never really seen fried pins on iPhones. The frayed cables are pretty much inevitable especially if it is apples first party cables. Shockingly I have had contamination in usbc ports though. It caused several devices of mine to no longer charge due to corrosion. Still not sure what exactly caused it but I suppose it was juice from a vape that leaked into the connector. Basically fried my laptop c ports, my iPads port and my pixel’s port. I still think the move to c was pretty necessary. Only complaint is cables that have contaminants can easily travel between devices now. Other than that the protocol support is all over the place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cujo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago Everyone I know who uses an iPhone has had fried pins on the cable, not necessarily on their device. No one I know personally has had any issues with USB-C. Though both experiences are anecdotal, I think we can take this away from our conversation at least: no cable design is perfect. Lol! permalink fedilink source parent [+] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Mini-USB wasn't very common. Micro-USB was common. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 9 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Amilo159@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Consistent in connecting /charging on first try, compared to micro usb. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cujo@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 years ago (2 children) Consistent in frying pins and fraying cables. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fuzzypyro@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) I worked cellular retail for 8 years I’ve never really seen fried pins on iPhones. The frayed cables are pretty much inevitable especially if it is apples first party cables. Shockingly I have had contamination in usbc ports though. It caused several devices of mine to no longer charge due to corrosion. Still not sure what exactly caused it but I suppose it was juice from a vape that leaked into the connector. Basically fried my laptop c ports, my iPads port and my pixel’s port. I still think the move to c was pretty necessary. Only complaint is cables that have contaminants can easily travel between devices now. Other than that the protocol support is all over the place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cujo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago Everyone I know who uses an iPhone has had fried pins on the cable, not necessarily on their device. No one I know personally has had any issues with USB-C. Though both experiences are anecdotal, I think we can take this away from our conversation at least: no cable design is perfect. Lol! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fuzzypyro@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) I worked cellular retail for 8 years I’ve never really seen fried pins on iPhones. The frayed cables are pretty much inevitable especially if it is apples first party cables. Shockingly I have had contamination in usbc ports though. It caused several devices of mine to no longer charge due to corrosion. Still not sure what exactly caused it but I suppose it was juice from a vape that leaked into the connector. Basically fried my laptop c ports, my iPads port and my pixel’s port. I still think the move to c was pretty necessary. Only complaint is cables that have contaminants can easily travel between devices now. Other than that the protocol support is all over the place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cujo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago Everyone I know who uses an iPhone has had fried pins on the cable, not necessarily on their device. No one I know personally has had any issues with USB-C. Though both experiences are anecdotal, I think we can take this away from our conversation at least: no cable design is perfect. Lol! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cujo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago Everyone I know who uses an iPhone has had fried pins on the cable, not necessarily on their device. No one I know personally has had any issues with USB-C. Though both experiences are anecdotal, I think we can take this away from our conversation at least: no cable design is perfect. Lol! permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Mini-USB wasn't very common. Micro-USB was common. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 9 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Mini-USB wasn't very common. Micro-USB was common. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 9 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 9 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Amilo159@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Consistent in connecting /charging on first try, compared to micro usb. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Phrodo_00@lemmy.world 15 points 3 years ago (8 children) Lightning's data transfer and charging are subpar, although I'm not sure if Apple is implementing PD fast charging on the new iPhone either. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] HRDS_654@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (6 children) They are not, unless you get the pro as far as I have seen/heard. The regular iPhone is artificially limited to USB 2.0 speeds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago It is not artificially limited. It’s using the board from last year’s Pro model. It doesn’t have a USB3 interface. permalink fedilink source parent [–] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 years ago USB 2.0 vs. 3.0 data has nothing to do with USB PD charging wattage. permalink fedilink source parent [–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) The Pro still doesn't have PD charging. When they go portless (I'm guessing next year or 2) they don't want people bitching that the charging is slower, so they're not going to support wired charging that's faster than wireless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 years ago The same law that forces standardised cable by the EU also forces Apple to not go portless, since it needs a standardised port on the device that can be used to charge. permalink fedilink source parent [–] clutchmatic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago This is to force users to use cloud solutions and lock users in the apple ecosystem permalink fedilink source parent [+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [+] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 9 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HRDS_654@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (6 children) They are not, unless you get the pro as far as I have seen/heard. The regular iPhone is artificially limited to USB 2.0 speeds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago It is not artificially limited. It’s using the board from last year’s Pro model. It doesn’t have a USB3 interface. permalink fedilink source parent [–] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 years ago USB 2.0 vs. 3.0 data has nothing to do with USB PD charging wattage. permalink fedilink source parent [–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) The Pro still doesn't have PD charging. When they go portless (I'm guessing next year or 2) they don't want people bitching that the charging is slower, so they're not going to support wired charging that's faster than wireless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 years ago The same law that forces standardised cable by the EU also forces Apple to not go portless, since it needs a standardised port on the device that can be used to charge. permalink fedilink source parent [–] clutchmatic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago This is to force users to use cloud solutions and lock users in the apple ecosystem permalink fedilink source parent [+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago It is not artificially limited. It’s using the board from last year’s Pro model. It doesn’t have a USB3 interface. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 years ago USB 2.0 vs. 3.0 data has nothing to do with USB PD charging wattage. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) The Pro still doesn't have PD charging. When they go portless (I'm guessing next year or 2) they don't want people bitching that the charging is slower, so they're not going to support wired charging that's faster than wireless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 years ago The same law that forces standardised cable by the EU also forces Apple to not go portless, since it needs a standardised port on the device that can be used to charge. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 years ago The same law that forces standardised cable by the EU also forces Apple to not go portless, since it needs a standardised port on the device that can be used to charge. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] clutchmatic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago This is to force users to use cloud solutions and lock users in the apple ecosystem permalink fedilink source parent
[+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 9 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent