I've seen people make this sort of argument against the libs in the past, usually with a "would you rather eat dog shit, or dog shit with broken glass in it?" and the correct answer is obviously neither of them because neither of them are edible. But I see they've tried to defang the argument and put it into terms where it is actually a positive when you push for reprehensible things, because the other guy is worse, just like they did with the trolley problem.