you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 child)

Putting "AI functionality", i.e. the denoising models I developed that are included in Darktable in the same realm as LLM slop is an interesting choice.

I collected all of the training data myself and did all of the training on a university GPU (which is consumer grade, I plan on continuing the work on my own machine). Everything is open (research, data, code) and reproducible.

I'm curious what's the ethical or other issue there.

Edit: I posted a discussion on their issue tracker: https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware/issues/1628 , of course it was closed right away and I was blocked from the repository and my response was deleted and they limited responses to contributors-only.

Looks like ethical AI is too sensitive of a subject for ethical-foss-admin.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago

    I guess people have grown phobia for the word "AI". Nobody even looks for the definition and use. Technically anything capable of computation/problem solving can be labeled as such, if we are willing to stretch the rules far enough. Even mechanical computers. But those are not in the spotlight right now.

  • source
  • parent