you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 16 hours ago (16 children)

Unfortunately the bubble popping will not provide you with better or cheaper access to those. At this point it is artificially created scarcity because they don't want consumers to own hardware anymore. Even with the AI bubble popping, the tech oligarchs (with NVIDA at the helm) will still be pursuing their wet dreams of consumers having to subscribe to their cloudbased computers for everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

    I will quit the internet before I become a renter of everything I used to just use free.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 13 hours ago*

    You might, I think I would (at least personally, professionally I may not have a choice) but the vast majority of people will gladly go with this plan I suspect.

    Look at car purchasing, most people don't look at the sticker price or the total cost of ownership, they stop paying attention as long as their income can (and in a lot of cases it technically can but really shouldn't) support the monthly payment.

    Similar thing with new phones, most people buy a service plan that includes a lease or loan on a device. Very few people buy their sevice outright, because that's a big purchase vs. a smaller monthly payment.

    If there was a market for this for laptops, regular folks would eat it up.

    That's all opinion, so take it for what it's worth. I hope I'm wrong. I'm fearful I'm not.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 15 hours ago

    I love computers but never enough to participate in their plans.

    I know how to read. Write. Draw. Go on walks. Play sports. Basically sit and watch paint dry than give a shit about not using a computer again

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 15 hours ago* (2 children)

    Free or one time purchase and possible payments for once in a while big updates. I don’t mind paying when the offer is good and I have money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 16 hours ago (9 children)

    Other manufactures will arise then. Won't be quick, won't be painless, but the US is not the whole world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 15 hours ago (8 children)

    You seem pretty sure about that. But where was the competition when they forced the switch to CD's? The manufacturers are engaged in a shit-trust, and other anti-competitive behavior.

    No one will step up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 14 hours ago (7 children)

    Thats not… I feel like you weren’t alive yet when that transition happened.

    Because CDs are objectively better in basically every way than VHS and cassette, especially for consumers. No more tapes stuck in the player, no more rewinding, no more randomly unspooled tapes, no more twisted ribbons, no more seeking static, no more heat warping, etc. plus cds take up less space overall, and you can easily use many-disc cd changers.

    The market absolutely drove that transition, not manufacturers. VHS and cassette were still supported and produced for a LONG time after cds came about, because not everyone was willing to drop a ton of money to get their collection in a new format.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 12 hours ago

    Also just to add that the transition from tapes to CDs and DVDs took decades, by the time tapes finally were fazed out blueray was a thing. I have a copy of Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkeban on VHS that's what 04 I also have a copy of Sabatons Great War album on cassette because fuck it why not. Even now cassette still kinda alive.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -6 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

    CD's are not better. They scratch easily, and the players break. Like right away. I have vhs that still work, no cd player still works outside of a laptop or game consul, and the disks scratch and get ruined.

    That you think they are better, ruins your credibility with me personally on this. You clearly don't fucking get it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 12 hours ago

    I'm going to have to agree with the other guy. I have working VHS tapes and working CDs/DVDs that are both over 30 years old. That just means that you didn't abuse them and kept them away from bad temperature and humidity ranges. CDs were so much better than cassettes that it wasn't even funny. If you were abusing your CDs so much that they were getting scratched to hell, I can't imagine you weren't running into similar issues with your tapes. DVD were vastly better than VHS in much the same way. And the "better" wasn't even about durability which was probably a wash as they failed in different ways. CDs had better audio quality and better quality of life for the user. You had no need to rewind/fast-forward. The audio didn't get continually more staticy as time went on. They took up less storage space, especially if you used a CD wallet/book. You didn't need to clean the heads on a CD player. All these same issues applied to DVD vs VHS other than skipping around a DVD is less common than a CD as movies and shows tend to be viewed sequentially.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

    Wow. Ok have fun with that personality.. eesh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

    Oh, the personality of not believing the oligarchs in the face of some credulous half wit? I will, thanks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments