▲ 161 ▼ 56k.rip - The full 1996 dial-up experience (56k.rip) submitted 1 week ago by klu9@piefed.social to c/retronet@lemmy.sdf.org 24 comments fedilink hide all child comments The full 1996 dial-up experience: the handshake, the wait, someone picking up the phone. Sound on. From https://mastodon.social/@HobbyBuilder/117345001508833633
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (8 children) Only rich people had 56k in 96 permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] rozodru@piefed.world 16 points 1 week ago* (1 child) my parents bought me a 56K modem in 97 for christmas. it was my ONLY christmas present that year. But man did I feel like hot shit after installing it. I'd go on mIRC and tell everyone I'd host the games of XvT, Jedi Knight: DF2, Mechwarrior 2, etc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago Damn man. You were cool. What happened that now you’re one of us here on Lemmy? permalink fedilink source parent [–] adarza@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 child) iirc the first usr x2 and k56flex modems weren't out til 1997 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago Then you discovered that the other side was still running on a 28k modem, and you never really got 56k... permalink fedilink source parent [–] exaybachae@startrek.website 1 point 1 week ago Or people with priorities. permalink fedilink source parent [–] darreninthenet@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago (2 children) This doesn't feel right, we had our first ADSL line in the uk in 1998 and we were in a student flat share! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 child) DSL requires a short distance to the phone switch, and splitting one faster line would be cheaper than four phone lines. DSL didn’t really come to a lot of the US because things are so spread out here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OakTree@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago Eh. DSL actually negotiates across a bunch of different encodings, and g.dmt dropped max speeds in favor of reliability and it could be shot for miles. They were only getting 1.5 or 768, but it was still better than dialup. A random google search suggests 89% of the US population was within DSL range on legacy copper lines. If it wasn’t available you were way out there, or you were experiencing the lovely duopoly we have: the cable company beat the telecom to high speed in the area, so the telecom said fuck it for 5 years. VDSL is when the extremely short distances started. By that time fiber was cheap enough for random backhaul runs but not ftth, so the battery(voltage) for the phone line still came from the CO miles away but the VDSL cabinet was practically in your backyard and data collected onto fiber from there. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rozodru@piefed.world 16 points 1 week ago* (1 child) my parents bought me a 56K modem in 97 for christmas. it was my ONLY christmas present that year. But man did I feel like hot shit after installing it. I'd go on mIRC and tell everyone I'd host the games of XvT, Jedi Knight: DF2, Mechwarrior 2, etc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago Damn man. You were cool. What happened that now you’re one of us here on Lemmy? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago Damn man. You were cool. What happened that now you’re one of us here on Lemmy? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 child) iirc the first usr x2 and k56flex modems weren't out til 1997 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago Then you discovered that the other side was still running on a 28k modem, and you never really got 56k... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago Then you discovered that the other side was still running on a 28k modem, and you never really got 56k... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] exaybachae@startrek.website 1 point 1 week ago Or people with priorities. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] darreninthenet@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago (2 children) This doesn't feel right, we had our first ADSL line in the uk in 1998 and we were in a student flat share! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 child) DSL requires a short distance to the phone switch, and splitting one faster line would be cheaper than four phone lines. DSL didn’t really come to a lot of the US because things are so spread out here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OakTree@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago Eh. DSL actually negotiates across a bunch of different encodings, and g.dmt dropped max speeds in favor of reliability and it could be shot for miles. They were only getting 1.5 or 768, but it was still better than dialup. A random google search suggests 89% of the US population was within DSL range on legacy copper lines. If it wasn’t available you were way out there, or you were experiencing the lovely duopoly we have: the cable company beat the telecom to high speed in the area, so the telecom said fuck it for 5 years. VDSL is when the extremely short distances started. By that time fiber was cheap enough for random backhaul runs but not ftth, so the battery(voltage) for the phone line still came from the CO miles away but the VDSL cabinet was practically in your backyard and data collected onto fiber from there. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 child) DSL requires a short distance to the phone switch, and splitting one faster line would be cheaper than four phone lines. DSL didn’t really come to a lot of the US because things are so spread out here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OakTree@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago Eh. DSL actually negotiates across a bunch of different encodings, and g.dmt dropped max speeds in favor of reliability and it could be shot for miles. They were only getting 1.5 or 768, but it was still better than dialup. A random google search suggests 89% of the US population was within DSL range on legacy copper lines. If it wasn’t available you were way out there, or you were experiencing the lovely duopoly we have: the cable company beat the telecom to high speed in the area, so the telecom said fuck it for 5 years. VDSL is when the extremely short distances started. By that time fiber was cheap enough for random backhaul runs but not ftth, so the battery(voltage) for the phone line still came from the CO miles away but the VDSL cabinet was practically in your backyard and data collected onto fiber from there. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OakTree@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago Eh. DSL actually negotiates across a bunch of different encodings, and g.dmt dropped max speeds in favor of reliability and it could be shot for miles. They were only getting 1.5 or 768, but it was still better than dialup. A random google search suggests 89% of the US population was within DSL range on legacy copper lines. If it wasn’t available you were way out there, or you were experiencing the lovely duopoly we have: the cable company beat the telecom to high speed in the area, so the telecom said fuck it for 5 years. VDSL is when the extremely short distances started. By that time fiber was cheap enough for random backhaul runs but not ftth, so the battery(voltage) for the phone line still came from the CO miles away but the VDSL cabinet was practically in your backyard and data collected onto fiber from there. permalink fedilink source parent