this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
629 points (95.5% liked)

Fediverse

27830 readers
175 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That seems to be the growing consensus on some of the biggest instances. Hopefully they start prioritizing that, or some other nice dev who knows Rust will. Maybe I need to start brushing up on it lol.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't see really any questions relating to mod tools or moderation outside of the one that was talking about the join-lemmy lists. Is that what you are referring to or do you mean the lack of mod tool discussion on that AMA?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

A couple of beehaw admin had questions about the status of moderation tooling and the Lemmy Devs were like "not an emphasis"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I kind of feel like that may be a major strategic mistake.

It won't be long before any given instance is overrun with alt right or other disruptive sorts if there aren't good tools to help moderators/admins.

One of beehaw's admins' feature requests is for more granular instance controls such as blocking (defederating) at the community level.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

To be fair, I think at the time, Lemmy had major performance issues. I can see how sorting that out is a big priority as well.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why did two people downvote this? That's exactly what happened. The devs stated they didn't care much for mod tools at the moment and also stated they wouldn't remove exploding heads from join-lemmy in another thread in the AMA, which is a whole other level of wtf.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

The reality of it is that the platform wasn't well thought out. The primary motivation was to copy Reddit functionally from a users perspective. That moderation tooling wasn't even much of an afterthought is telling considering the language choice.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Just waiting on someone to create Reddit in forum form so long discussions over weeks/months/years on any type of subject can happen...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Think those are just called forums?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Some things like federated identities, or even federated content would go a long way into making forums a thing again.

I still think lemmy could use a "community type" enum where you can say what kind of discussion you want there.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, what I mean is instead of having separate forums for everything, a Reddit/Lemmy type platform where people can create their own community to start threads. So if I wanted I could create a tractor community with sub communities for different brands and in there would be a single discussion to discuss a specific model, but my credentials would also allow me to go on the cooking community, in the baking sub community to take part in a discussion on strawberry shortcakes that's been going on for months...

Reddit type "forums" just lead to the same questions/content being posted again and again and if you know a lot about a subject and just happen to miss the one time someone asks a question about it then that discussion is lost to time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, I see what you mean. I feel like that adds a lot of moderation overhead though because it needs people there to stop nefarious grave-digging.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Instead of resurrecting old posts, on Reddit/Lemmy you have people asking the same question again and again and again... On the cars subreddit you have the same "most interesting 5k$ car for sale around where you live" post getting created every few weeks, on a bulletin board you would have a single thread and people would just post new stuff when it comes out, the thread would come back to the top of the community's front page and those interested would go check the newer reply...

I'm honestly surprised how many people that reply to me don't seem to have experienced bulletin boards considering they're still the place that "experts" hang on for most things (vs Reddit that is a better fit for enthusiasts that don't want very technical info)...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Cheers, still use forums for very granular info. I think it's more of a scale issue. If you put the volume of users on these niche forums as are on reddit/lemmy, I think the multi-post nonsense would ensue. I remember having to tell a lot of people to use the search in forums. Sounds similar.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Kind of like if there was a Lemmy Star Trek server and it hosted a bunch of communities with different topics that are all related to Star Trek?

The architecture is in place to do what you're talking about. Just needs the right people to adopt the approach over time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes and no, the bulletin board system leads to more in depth discussions than anything you'll ever get on the Reddit system of discussions that don't get bumped...

So what I'm talking about is a decentralized bulletin board system with the federation system in place, so you can sign up to the Star Trek bulletin board but use the same log in to post on the Home Renovations bulletin board...

Basically, fix the biggest issue with forums, i.e. having to create an account for every single topic that interests you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's just a function of how the host server sorts posts. ~~I am fairly sure that functionality could be implemented without the need to even fork the version.~~

You can go to your user setting and select new comments and do this now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It still doesn't work like bulletin boards where all users would see discussions get bumped and replies were linear. It only works if the sorting mechanism is the same for everyone and the discussion is ongoing. I could point you to discussions that are still active more than ten years after they started, where all the knowledge available on a subject is available...

Here's an example: https://www.advrider.com/f/threads/klr650-only-thread.742912/

Over 42 000 replies over 12 years on that specific model of motorcycle, that's simply impossible on a platform that doesn't work like bulletin boards do.

Bulletin boards is like having people sitting at a table and discussing a specific subject. Reddit/Lemmy is like an event with everyone scattered around the place with groups each having separate conversations, it might be a Star Trek convention, but you can't follow every conversations so the same thing keeps getting repeated again and again by different people because they don't realize someone already said the same thing.

There's a reason specialists still hang on forums and enthusiasts hang on Reddit...

Edit: The Lemmy devs even started developing my idea, but development stopped when the Exodus happened...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I miss forums so much. A federated backend for forums would be nice. I'm so tired of having these giant communities of angry strangers if I want to talk about anything

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

😱

Edit: And both instances don't work 🤣

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah i forgot to mention it hasn’t been maintained since the huge influx of users

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

In theory, but I used to hate when people would get mad at threads getting brought back from the dead. If the person has a question relevant to the topic, why start a new thread?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Not as if that was solved by instead having people tell OP to research the answer one of the many (now dead) discussions where the same question was asked!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's a culture-thing. I'm a member of two forums that are still pretty active. One views dead thread revivals as amusing, the other almost literally has a celebration in-thread when it happens as all the members with older posts in it come piling in. Heck, the second forum has a thread so active that people literally ask for, and get, recaps for the last X amount of time for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly, some people would complain about bringing back zombie threads, while others whine that people didn't use the search feature to find existing threads on the topic. You can't win either way with forum gatekeepers.