The rationale is interesting. I'm glad they kept the logo as it's recycling ♻️

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

No, but it was a helluva lot more obvious what it was. I guess I understand their reasoning, but it's yet another obscure name among the innumerable ones out there already.

  • source
  • parent