Trans journalist Erin Reed has published a list of Democratic midterm candidates with anti-trans records, and the question she is forcing is one the party would rather not answer: if trans voters keep rewarding Democrats who harm them, what signal does that send? The calculation is real, the stakes are high, and there is no clean answer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 4 days ago (1 child)

And furthermore, politics is about building coalitions. No two candidates will ever agree on everything, and no candidate will ever represent every single one of your interests. You have to pick the best choice for you out of what you've got. If you think a Republican will represent your interests as a trans person more than a Democrat, then go for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    You really misunderstand coalitions. The whole point of a coalition is that a bunch of minority groups will get together and say, "I'll support your issues if you support my issues." The minute the rest turn against one member group of that coalition, they're no longer part of that coalition.

    You're asking trans people to support a party that is actively seeking to throw trans people out of the party. According to transphobe democratics, trans people simply are not part of the Democratic coalition.

  • source
  • parent