cross-posted from: https://scribe.disroot.org/post/11518963

Nokia closes down its radio technology R&D center in China as European vendors are forced out of the country over China's 'national security' concerns.

...

Nokia has confirmed it is winding down its radio technology research and development centre in Hangzhou by the end of 2026, cutting roughly 1,600 jobs and quietly closing the book on a China strategy that has been unravelling for the better part of a decade. Staff were told on Thursday, August 13.

The company's explanation was clinical—it is aligning its China operations with how Nokia works globally, and its business there has been shrinking for years. Light Reading reports that Nokia sites in Beijing, Chengdu, Qingdao and Shanghai could follow, though the company hasn't confirmed that.

...

What makes the timing interesting is the argument it revives. In September 2025, at a press conference in Oulu, Finland, Nokia CEO Justin Hotard asked Europe a question it still hasn't properly answered: "Why do we allow high-risk vendors in Europe in our networks," he said, when Nokia holds under 3% share in China?

Nokia executives said at the time they had been told European vendors were to be pushed out of China on national security grounds. The Hangzhou shutdown is what that warning looks like on the ground.

...

Nokia's China revenue has more than halved since 2018 The numbers explain the exit better than any statement does. Nokia's Greater China sales fell from nearly €2.2 billion in 2018 to €913 million in 2025—a drop of more than 58%. The turn came in 2020, when Nokia lost out on key radio access network contracts with China Mobile, China Telecom and China Unicom. What looked like a product problem then looks structural now.

...

Danish analyst John Strand put it flatly in January: "China is lost land for vendors like Ericsson and Nokia."

...

Hotard's complaint about asymmetry hasn't aged. Huawei accounts for roughly 59% of Germany's 5G radio sites, according to Strand Consult data cited by the country's interior ministry. Only 13 of the EU's 27 member states had fully or partly adopted the bloc's 5G security toolbox as of 2025. Brussels is now moving to make it mandatory—a shift Hotard called "a very good and important step" in January. Germany wants Chinese components in RAN networks down to 25% by October 1, 2026.

...

Archived

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 3 days ago* (3 children)

"We wanted to augment profits by killing jobs and moving them overseas but they are kicking us out, can you ban them now? Have you thought of the danger of a company that has all it's dev and manufacturing in a foreign country, now that we aren't doing that anymore?"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Nokia (and many others) considered China as a market to sell their products. The Chinese government demanded that companies that want to sell to China should also invest and produce in their country. That's perfectly okay. It's just that they then didn't allow foreign companies to sell.

    For example, a foreign carmaker can't found a subsidiary in China. It needs a Chinese partner that would then own the majority of the joint venture. When the foreign company then develops a new car, it must hand over the entire technical specifications to the Chinese state. You can then be sure that a year or so later, there is a similar car on Chinese roads, but it's probably cheaper, one reason being that they didn't need to do the development work.

    And this is only one reason why non-Chinese companies can't be successful in Chinese domestic markets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    Fair point. It just feels hollow I guess, when big companies cry foul about their overseas adventures going bad. They didn't mind moving all their manufacturing there, and whatever moved away from China went straight to India.

    I guess it's two bad actors, but tbh, China is only bad because it's an attack on capitalism. It's kind of just a smart move. I don't think our system of bootlicking capitalist overlords and accepting their bribes is necessarily the better play.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago

    I think in this case it's more about the fact that China likely puts backdoors into tech (same as us does) so they can spy. European infrastructure should not have these vulnerabilities.

    I do agree on your other points though.

  • source
  • parent