Hmm, (thelemmy.club)
submitted 1 week ago by to c/memes@hexbear.net
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 1 week ago (1 child)

The G11 (successful project that it was lol) had square ammo and its performance issues don't seem to have come from square ammo.

Notes on other people in this thread:

  • The casing during firing acts as a seal for the chamber, which can very safely contain the detonation of the round (which is more of a slow burn, no worries of material damaging unpredictable shockwaves).
  • Alignment might be an issue, but it would be coming out of a magazine in a predictable manner. There aren't really mechanical forces imparting spin on the round until it is fired.

Idle thoughts:

  • In order to have the same structural integrity, the case would have to be thicker, though not much more so given a round has plenty of strength for supporting itself in a magazine.
  • It might reduce friction in a magazine, allowing magazines to be longer. Stacked round bullets impart quite a lot of the magazine spring's force off into the side of the magazine.
  • It might allow a greater volume of the magazine to be propellant, allowing for either a shorter magazine for the same ammo count or a larger magazine.
  • It would be more difficult to manufacture. Circles are where its at for manufacturing.
  • It would be specialist ammunition for one make of firearm. Not insurmountable, but does make it cost a lot for not much benefit.

I propose hexagonal telescoping casings for double stacking tiny magazines.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment