you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 17 hours ago (1 child)

The last option you are describing is a CEO. The employee who among the officers, charged by the board to execute their decisions, is chief among them. That's what makes them a CEO. Their mandate, authority and wages are decided by the board. And in the companies where the workers have a controlling majority, the CEO is unlikely to have either absolute majority nor an disproportional wage.

You have described how a workplace owned and managed by the workers can be compatible with the role of a chief executive officer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago

    Sure, I guess by technical definition. But popularly, if you describe a role that has no power except to communicate decisions of the board and who is not paid excessively, most people are not going to think “CEO.”

  • source
  • parent