▲ 2016 ▼ The EU has finally won this one! (feddit.de) submitted 3 years ago by Oiconomia@feddit.de to c/memes@lemmy.ml 376 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 152 points 3 years ago (11 children) Yeah alternative was MicroUSB which is dogshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] M500@lemmy.ml 74 points 3 years ago (10 children) I’m using my wife’s old android for YouTube. It has a microusb port and I really hate it. Lighting was leaps better than that, but usb-c is really the king of ports at the moment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 18 points 3 years ago (5 children) This is the only valid opinion. Perhaps one day we get a magnetic replacement for USB-C. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Draghetta@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 years ago (4 children) Why a replacement? You can already buy usb c cables with detachable magnetic heads if you fancy that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Technofrood@feddit.uk 11 points 3 years ago* Would be a nice thing to have in the spec for the cable, as those ones aren't compliant with the spec, and can in some cases cause problems, like on disconnect it might be possible for one of the PD pins to short against one of the data pins before the side delivering power has had time to process the disconnect. It's a pretty specific edge case and I'm sure not a problem most people have had or will run into, but would be nice if it could be part of the spec. permalink fedilink source parent [–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Fair enough, an officially sanctioned extension would also be fine! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deeznutz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 years ago We can call it the USB 3.2 Gen2x2 Magnets, How Do They Work Edition permalink fedilink source parent [–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 years ago Because it is usb-c, the magnetised version is also officially sanctioned. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FailBait@lemmy.world 13 points 3 years ago (1 child) It’s the king of ports at the moment but I have concerns about the fact there’s that “prong” in the middle of the female connector. It seems like it could be something to break. I did like the fact there wasn’t anything in the middle of the lightning port, made it seem more durable to me over time (at least the port side, but that’s what you want with these things…) Nevermind that the same connector could be USB 3.1 Gen X fuckton-gigabit, USB4, Thunderbolt 3 or 4… USB needs to learn from the WiFi groups recent rename scheme… permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago Lightening cables have easy to clean contacts and a hard to break jack, I have broken many many usb-c cables just stepping on them or rolling over them with an office chair or getting filled with lint on the inside of the jack. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Artemis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) No hate, but I cannot fathom feeling the way you do about Micro USB and not spending $200 on some of the very solid Android phones that have come out in the 9 years since USB C has been the standard. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] M500@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago I only started using it like a month ago and I’m already looking at a used galaxy s10e. They are like $140 where I live. But I will get a new iPhone first. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] M500@lemmy.ml 74 points 3 years ago (10 children) I’m using my wife’s old android for YouTube. It has a microusb port and I really hate it. Lighting was leaps better than that, but usb-c is really the king of ports at the moment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 18 points 3 years ago (5 children) This is the only valid opinion. Perhaps one day we get a magnetic replacement for USB-C. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Draghetta@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 years ago (4 children) Why a replacement? You can already buy usb c cables with detachable magnetic heads if you fancy that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Technofrood@feddit.uk 11 points 3 years ago* Would be a nice thing to have in the spec for the cable, as those ones aren't compliant with the spec, and can in some cases cause problems, like on disconnect it might be possible for one of the PD pins to short against one of the data pins before the side delivering power has had time to process the disconnect. It's a pretty specific edge case and I'm sure not a problem most people have had or will run into, but would be nice if it could be part of the spec. permalink fedilink source parent [–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Fair enough, an officially sanctioned extension would also be fine! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deeznutz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 years ago We can call it the USB 3.2 Gen2x2 Magnets, How Do They Work Edition permalink fedilink source parent [–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 years ago Because it is usb-c, the magnetised version is also officially sanctioned. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FailBait@lemmy.world 13 points 3 years ago (1 child) It’s the king of ports at the moment but I have concerns about the fact there’s that “prong” in the middle of the female connector. It seems like it could be something to break. I did like the fact there wasn’t anything in the middle of the lightning port, made it seem more durable to me over time (at least the port side, but that’s what you want with these things…) Nevermind that the same connector could be USB 3.1 Gen X fuckton-gigabit, USB4, Thunderbolt 3 or 4… USB needs to learn from the WiFi groups recent rename scheme… permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago Lightening cables have easy to clean contacts and a hard to break jack, I have broken many many usb-c cables just stepping on them or rolling over them with an office chair or getting filled with lint on the inside of the jack. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Artemis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) No hate, but I cannot fathom feeling the way you do about Micro USB and not spending $200 on some of the very solid Android phones that have come out in the 9 years since USB C has been the standard. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] M500@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago I only started using it like a month ago and I’m already looking at a used galaxy s10e. They are like $140 where I live. But I will get a new iPhone first. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 18 points 3 years ago (5 children) This is the only valid opinion. Perhaps one day we get a magnetic replacement for USB-C. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Draghetta@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 years ago (4 children) Why a replacement? You can already buy usb c cables with detachable magnetic heads if you fancy that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Technofrood@feddit.uk 11 points 3 years ago* Would be a nice thing to have in the spec for the cable, as those ones aren't compliant with the spec, and can in some cases cause problems, like on disconnect it might be possible for one of the PD pins to short against one of the data pins before the side delivering power has had time to process the disconnect. It's a pretty specific edge case and I'm sure not a problem most people have had or will run into, but would be nice if it could be part of the spec. permalink fedilink source parent [–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Fair enough, an officially sanctioned extension would also be fine! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deeznutz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 years ago We can call it the USB 3.2 Gen2x2 Magnets, How Do They Work Edition permalink fedilink source parent [–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 years ago Because it is usb-c, the magnetised version is also officially sanctioned. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Draghetta@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 years ago (4 children) Why a replacement? You can already buy usb c cables with detachable magnetic heads if you fancy that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Technofrood@feddit.uk 11 points 3 years ago* Would be a nice thing to have in the spec for the cable, as those ones aren't compliant with the spec, and can in some cases cause problems, like on disconnect it might be possible for one of the PD pins to short against one of the data pins before the side delivering power has had time to process the disconnect. It's a pretty specific edge case and I'm sure not a problem most people have had or will run into, but would be nice if it could be part of the spec. permalink fedilink source parent [–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Fair enough, an officially sanctioned extension would also be fine! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deeznutz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 years ago We can call it the USB 3.2 Gen2x2 Magnets, How Do They Work Edition permalink fedilink source parent [–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 years ago Because it is usb-c, the magnetised version is also officially sanctioned. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Technofrood@feddit.uk 11 points 3 years ago* Would be a nice thing to have in the spec for the cable, as those ones aren't compliant with the spec, and can in some cases cause problems, like on disconnect it might be possible for one of the PD pins to short against one of the data pins before the side delivering power has had time to process the disconnect. It's a pretty specific edge case and I'm sure not a problem most people have had or will run into, but would be nice if it could be part of the spec. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Fair enough, an officially sanctioned extension would also be fine! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deeznutz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 years ago We can call it the USB 3.2 Gen2x2 Magnets, How Do They Work Edition permalink fedilink source parent [–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 years ago Because it is usb-c, the magnetised version is also officially sanctioned. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deeznutz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 years ago We can call it the USB 3.2 Gen2x2 Magnets, How Do They Work Edition permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 years ago Because it is usb-c, the magnetised version is also officially sanctioned. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FailBait@lemmy.world 13 points 3 years ago (1 child) It’s the king of ports at the moment but I have concerns about the fact there’s that “prong” in the middle of the female connector. It seems like it could be something to break. I did like the fact there wasn’t anything in the middle of the lightning port, made it seem more durable to me over time (at least the port side, but that’s what you want with these things…) Nevermind that the same connector could be USB 3.1 Gen X fuckton-gigabit, USB4, Thunderbolt 3 or 4… USB needs to learn from the WiFi groups recent rename scheme… permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago Lightening cables have easy to clean contacts and a hard to break jack, I have broken many many usb-c cables just stepping on them or rolling over them with an office chair or getting filled with lint on the inside of the jack. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago Lightening cables have easy to clean contacts and a hard to break jack, I have broken many many usb-c cables just stepping on them or rolling over them with an office chair or getting filled with lint on the inside of the jack. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Artemis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) No hate, but I cannot fathom feeling the way you do about Micro USB and not spending $200 on some of the very solid Android phones that have come out in the 9 years since USB C has been the standard. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] M500@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago I only started using it like a month ago and I’m already looking at a used galaxy s10e. They are like $140 where I live. But I will get a new iPhone first. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] M500@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago I only started using it like a month ago and I’m already looking at a used galaxy s10e. They are like $140 where I live. But I will get a new iPhone first. permalink fedilink source parent