β² 58 βΌ French far-left presidential candidate Melenchon blames Ukraine's deep strikes for war escalation (kyivindependent.com) submitted 5 days ago by Sunshine@piefed.ca to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz 56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[β] Sunshine@piefed.ca [S] 4 points 5 days ago (9 children) I really hope France doesnβt go fasciste. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 5 days ago (8 children) Probably not. The French left, right, and Macronist Center Right clearly have an evenish split with none of the three blocks big on giving one another a majority. So power is going to be who gets the plurality permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [β] Womble@piefed.world 1 point 4 days ago (5 children) Currently the polls have Le Pen winning in the second round against Melonchon or a centrist if she gets to through the second round (whihc seems almost certain). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 3 days ago (4 children) It's a dead heat for second place. And while polls say that I am not 100% sure they are accounting for tactical voting permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Womble@piefed.world 1 point 2 days ago (3 children) There is no tactical voting in the second round of a presidential election, there are only 2 candidates. It would be a straight up choice of do the French people prefer a centrist/leftist or a fascist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 days ago (2 children) aka a tactical vote as one literally has the option to not vote or spoil their ballot (risk of causing a vote split situation obviously but still.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Womble@piefed.world 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) I guess. Bit odd to describe just a regular vote of picking one of the two available options as tactical voting though. The polling definitely takes people voting into account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 day ago polling takes into account what one answers. if someone where to say they would not pick one or the other well then they couldn't be marked down, the polls in this situation doesn't have an undecided option. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Sunshine@piefed.ca [S] 1 point 5 days ago (1 child) I do not understand how the second round voting system works. Quebec has first-past-the-post π€’ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 days ago If no majority wins in first round the top two face off in the second round. This usually results in a electoral tactical vite of some kind permalink fedilink source parent
[β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 5 days ago (8 children) Probably not. The French left, right, and Macronist Center Right clearly have an evenish split with none of the three blocks big on giving one another a majority. So power is going to be who gets the plurality permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [β] Womble@piefed.world 1 point 4 days ago (5 children) Currently the polls have Le Pen winning in the second round against Melonchon or a centrist if she gets to through the second round (whihc seems almost certain). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 3 days ago (4 children) It's a dead heat for second place. And while polls say that I am not 100% sure they are accounting for tactical voting permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Womble@piefed.world 1 point 2 days ago (3 children) There is no tactical voting in the second round of a presidential election, there are only 2 candidates. It would be a straight up choice of do the French people prefer a centrist/leftist or a fascist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 days ago (2 children) aka a tactical vote as one literally has the option to not vote or spoil their ballot (risk of causing a vote split situation obviously but still.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Womble@piefed.world 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) I guess. Bit odd to describe just a regular vote of picking one of the two available options as tactical voting though. The polling definitely takes people voting into account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 day ago polling takes into account what one answers. if someone where to say they would not pick one or the other well then they couldn't be marked down, the polls in this situation doesn't have an undecided option. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Sunshine@piefed.ca [S] 1 point 5 days ago (1 child) I do not understand how the second round voting system works. Quebec has first-past-the-post π€’ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 days ago If no majority wins in first round the top two face off in the second round. This usually results in a electoral tactical vite of some kind permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Womble@piefed.world 1 point 4 days ago (5 children) Currently the polls have Le Pen winning in the second round against Melonchon or a centrist if she gets to through the second round (whihc seems almost certain). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 3 days ago (4 children) It's a dead heat for second place. And while polls say that I am not 100% sure they are accounting for tactical voting permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Womble@piefed.world 1 point 2 days ago (3 children) There is no tactical voting in the second round of a presidential election, there are only 2 candidates. It would be a straight up choice of do the French people prefer a centrist/leftist or a fascist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 days ago (2 children) aka a tactical vote as one literally has the option to not vote or spoil their ballot (risk of causing a vote split situation obviously but still.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Womble@piefed.world 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) I guess. Bit odd to describe just a regular vote of picking one of the two available options as tactical voting though. The polling definitely takes people voting into account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 day ago polling takes into account what one answers. if someone where to say they would not pick one or the other well then they couldn't be marked down, the polls in this situation doesn't have an undecided option. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 3 days ago (4 children) It's a dead heat for second place. And while polls say that I am not 100% sure they are accounting for tactical voting permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] Womble@piefed.world 1 point 2 days ago (3 children) There is no tactical voting in the second round of a presidential election, there are only 2 candidates. It would be a straight up choice of do the French people prefer a centrist/leftist or a fascist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 days ago (2 children) aka a tactical vote as one literally has the option to not vote or spoil their ballot (risk of causing a vote split situation obviously but still.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Womble@piefed.world 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) I guess. Bit odd to describe just a regular vote of picking one of the two available options as tactical voting though. The polling definitely takes people voting into account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 day ago polling takes into account what one answers. if someone where to say they would not pick one or the other well then they couldn't be marked down, the polls in this situation doesn't have an undecided option. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Womble@piefed.world 1 point 2 days ago (3 children) There is no tactical voting in the second round of a presidential election, there are only 2 candidates. It would be a straight up choice of do the French people prefer a centrist/leftist or a fascist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 days ago (2 children) aka a tactical vote as one literally has the option to not vote or spoil their ballot (risk of causing a vote split situation obviously but still.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Womble@piefed.world 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) I guess. Bit odd to describe just a regular vote of picking one of the two available options as tactical voting though. The polling definitely takes people voting into account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 day ago polling takes into account what one answers. if someone where to say they would not pick one or the other well then they couldn't be marked down, the polls in this situation doesn't have an undecided option. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 days ago (2 children) aka a tactical vote as one literally has the option to not vote or spoil their ballot (risk of causing a vote split situation obviously but still.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Womble@piefed.world 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) I guess. Bit odd to describe just a regular vote of picking one of the two available options as tactical voting though. The polling definitely takes people voting into account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 day ago polling takes into account what one answers. if someone where to say they would not pick one or the other well then they couldn't be marked down, the polls in this situation doesn't have an undecided option. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Womble@piefed.world 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) I guess. Bit odd to describe just a regular vote of picking one of the two available options as tactical voting though. The polling definitely takes people voting into account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 day ago polling takes into account what one answers. if someone where to say they would not pick one or the other well then they couldn't be marked down, the polls in this situation doesn't have an undecided option. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 day ago polling takes into account what one answers. if someone where to say they would not pick one or the other well then they couldn't be marked down, the polls in this situation doesn't have an undecided option. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Sunshine@piefed.ca [S] 1 point 5 days ago (1 child) I do not understand how the second round voting system works. Quebec has first-past-the-post π€’ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 days ago If no majority wins in first round the top two face off in the second round. This usually results in a electoral tactical vite of some kind permalink fedilink source parent
[β] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 days ago If no majority wins in first round the top two face off in the second round. This usually results in a electoral tactical vite of some kind permalink fedilink source parent