▲ 160 ▼ Shirt Instruction. [241] (thelemmy.club) submitted 4 days ago by RustyNova@lemmy.world [M] to c/Mimi@lemmy.world 13 comments fedilink hide all child comments https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/149864882
[–] Maxxie@piefed.blahaj.zone 51 points 4 days ago (5 children) Maximum call stack size exceeded. permalink fedilink source hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago Oh I very much enjoyed the back and forth in the penetration test. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 9 points 4 days ago I download more ram permalink fedilink source parent [–] green_copper@kbin.earth 8 points 4 days ago (2 children) Only if you need to implement everything as a recursive call. This scenario can be nicely implemented with a simple loop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Bonsoir@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 child) Even with a loop, if you consider that you haven't finished looking into something until you've executed all sub-instructions, you would still have to keep track of everything in a stack. You would run out of memory at some point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] green_copper@kbin.earth 2 points 4 days ago If you interpret the text on her as a sub-instruction / call, then yes; you you interpret it as a direct (replacing) instruction / jump, then no. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago Oh I very much enjoyed the back and forth in the penetration test. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] green_copper@kbin.earth 8 points 4 days ago (2 children) Only if you need to implement everything as a recursive call. This scenario can be nicely implemented with a simple loop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Bonsoir@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 child) Even with a loop, if you consider that you haven't finished looking into something until you've executed all sub-instructions, you would still have to keep track of everything in a stack. You would run out of memory at some point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] green_copper@kbin.earth 2 points 4 days ago If you interpret the text on her as a sub-instruction / call, then yes; you you interpret it as a direct (replacing) instruction / jump, then no. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bonsoir@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 child) Even with a loop, if you consider that you haven't finished looking into something until you've executed all sub-instructions, you would still have to keep track of everything in a stack. You would run out of memory at some point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] green_copper@kbin.earth 2 points 4 days ago If you interpret the text on her as a sub-instruction / call, then yes; you you interpret it as a direct (replacing) instruction / jump, then no. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] green_copper@kbin.earth 2 points 4 days ago If you interpret the text on her as a sub-instruction / call, then yes; you you interpret it as a direct (replacing) instruction / jump, then no. permalink fedilink source parent
