you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 1 week ago* (8 children)

we can't even get self driving cars right yet, I'm not sure ATC is going to be any better (certainly not on whatever pittance the government will fund it). 99% reliability will probably be easy, it's that last 1% that could take decades to fix.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago* (6 children)

    We've had self flying and landing planes for years though. You can't really compare controlled airspace to the chaos that is operating on the ground.

    I'm still skeptical they won't fuck it up, but this should be a manageable problem for ai.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago

    We’ve had self flying and landing planes for years though

    Because none of it relies on any kind of AI. It doesn't have to make decisions, it just flies programmatically. If you commanded it to fly into the ground it would (has, Germanwings crash). Autopilot wont even respond to a collision avoidance resolution advisory.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    That’s different than AI tho

    That’s an example of a computer being utilized in the way ut should be (with predictable outcomes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    People don't realize that LLMs are not computers.

    LLMs are software that turns a computer (an incredibly powerful tool of reliability and precision) into an imitation of a room temperature IQ person who thinks they're an infallible genius because they can search google.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    It's one of those things that can absolutely be done with care, effort, and money. But we lack a government that will put any of those toward the project. And the private sector will actively undermine it to scrape a few more pennies off the top.

  • source
  • parent