you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

Curious. Carbon dating can confirm the mammoth tusk to -40k but why is it assumed it was carved then? Someone could have found the tusk later and carved it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    It's likely because of the layers (Upper-Paleolithic) the carvings were recovered from. The article links to futher findings which have also been dated to be around 40000 to 35000 years old.

  • source
  • parent