360
Xiaomi Has a Luxury SUV for $31,000 That All Western Brands Should Fear (www.wired.com)
submitted 1 week ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
211 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"We can't let the environment be a deciding factor" is a preposterous take. There's practically nothing more important that preserving the environment. Even the Chinese are looking beyond their borders for raw materials these days. If it costs more to extract raw materials in a way that doesn't fuck up the environment, then subsidize it and pay for it. We can fund the subsidies with a carbon tax.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    It's not a preposterous take for China. They do whatever it takes to win and it shows. Lower wages, less considerations for the environment, etc.

    Everything we care about has a cost. If we want the cheapest possible EVs, which most people here seem to want, then we need to ignore everything else. So you decide. Do you want super cheap EVs, or do you want good working conditions and limited pollution? And if it's the latter, tariffs on Chinese EVs make sense because they do not adhere by the same rules.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    I want the latter, and tariffs are not the only way go about protectionism. There is also subsidization, which is how the US has maintained its defense and agriculture industries. If we want stuff made domestically, we're going to have to pay for it. Subsidies are generally preferable to tariffs because they can be paid through progressive taxation instead of regressive taxes on consumers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent