you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 138 points 1 week ago (58 children)

They’ll be banned faster than you can memorize the spelling of Xiaomi. At least in the US, where we make sure the old inefficient companies stay afloat despite their incompetence.

  • source
  • hideshow 58 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (42 children)

    Chinese cars are heavily subsidized by the state. The reason they're so cheap is because China bets it can squeeze the competition out of the market before charging basically whatever they want.

    I've seen Starbucks do the same thing to independent coffee shops.

    Edit: This is a post about real car companies like Nissan, Volvo, Mercedes, Renault, whatever. I don't care about America. Nobody has for decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 42 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 1 week ago (24 children)

    Oh yeah, because US car companies are NOT subsidized at all /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 week ago

    Both statements can be true at the same time. But the scale of one is many times larger.

    China’s MO from rare earths and magnets to cars to silicon follows the same plan. Take IP, Subsidize the industry, Research, once you have a monopoly use it to squeeze adversaries.

    I will say at least China is willing to kill off underperforming companies.

    The US needs to let a lot of legacy companies that aren’t performing die off. It also needs to break up oligopolies in many industries. Why compete when you can buy up the future competitors and set prices with a handful of competitors. The financialization of our economy is choking us.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 47 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    And yet even at 2-3x the price, the Chinese EVs provide a better value than the handful of the American options they would compete against.

    This SUV would be competing with the likes of a high end EV option like Lucid or Tesla. The Lucid Gravity starts a around $70k, and the Tesla Model X (now discontinued) was around $92k.

    The Xiaomi SU7 (the car the Ford CEO has driven since 2024, despite being banned in the US) starts at $32k and clearly is targeted to compete the Porsche Taycan at $112k.

    The vehicle in this article has heated floors, a projector, a pop-up roof, a fridge, swiveling seats, and over 1,000 miles of range. Functions western companies consider "luxury" are basically just standard in the Chinese market like heated and ventilated seats. They don't even bother to advertise things like that because it's a minimum expectation. There are zero western options that come close to something like that. The options available in the US suck, even taking industry subsidies into account.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    heated floors, a projector, a pop-up roof, a fridge, swiveling seats,

    Never have I once thought I needed any of that bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    And yet there it is, along with basically every other "luxury" feature western companies save for high end models... all for the price of a base model SUV here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Those aren't luxury car features (minus the fridge), those are camper van features lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    The point is that what western car companies consider "luxury" features they charge extra for, like heated seats and that sort of thing, are basically standard there. So the luxury features they include to separate these models from the pack are these more niche things.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    High-end EV options

    Ok

    like Tesla

    ...fucking WHAT?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    I see you forget about the first 3 models that Tesla made that were $70k or higher when they were discontinued, and all launched at $90k+

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago

    They were only high-end EVs because the EV market was dogshit then. They've never competed with high-end cars in general.

    Unfortunately it's a race to the bottom and high-end cars are doing the same Tesla bullshit of a minimalist interior with a huge display instead of physical buttons with heft like they used to.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Chinese cars are heavily subsidized by the state

    Detroit has received $88B in subsidies and loans since 2008. That's why we have so many cheap EV options?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Heavily subsidized by misery, as well.

    Detroit pays union wages and has to respect worker rights (at the top end of the supply chain). The “communist “ state seems to escape these limited obligations in big parts of their supply chains.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Workers in Detroit might get paid union wages, but many auto factories have relocated to the South where they can underpay and abuse workers much more easily. I just did some quick googling and it seems like being a factory worker in China isn't bad compared to in the US. They work in highly automated, clean, air-conditioned spaces like would be found here. Dirty conditions and manual labor are no longer compatible with today's automotive quality requirements. Low level workers make modest wages, but they employ a bunch of engineers and technicians just like here in the US, and they have subsidized cafeterias and some provide housing or stipends for housing. You might criticize the expectation of working significant overtime, but I've worked in factories which had mandatory overtime in the US, so that sort of structural coercion isn't unique to China. Compared to a "right to work" state, Chinese workers have stronger protections from being laid off or fired. The main downside seems to be lax enforcement of safety standards. If the government doesn't notice something unsafe on its own, there isn't a Chinese version of dropping a hint to OSHA.

    Now further upstream in the supply chain? No thanks. That's where you'll find abysmal working conditions. Just remember there are good reasons our government wants us to believe everything sucks for workers in China.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    Frankly, american cars could use a knockdown. Tesla was our only real hope, and we would have glided into a strong Tesla and EV empire if conservative dems didn't bail out GM, Chrysler, and Ford. Additionally, Tesla wouldn't have been in a position to get bought by a dumb nazi.

    I'd say, let their stuff in. Lets get some good cheap and subsidizes vehicles from China on the condition that they don't raise car prices by more than 2% a year.

    American companies will more than likely fall on their face and hopefully die. Making room for a new american car company to take their place.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    American car companies (and American built cars) get subsidies from the US, Canada, and Mexico as all three form a single manufacturing chain. They simply have had a different set of priorities that allowed newcomers to eat their lunch, like it happens to any complacent industry.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago*

    Chinese cars are heavily subsidized by the state. The reason they're so cheap is because China bets it can squeeze the competition

    Used to be, to get them going, robotics, innovation and vertical integration is most of the reason now. An example, BYD have their own roro ships and have ordered another 10,

    https://www.whichcar.com.au/news/byd-orders-10-more-car-carriers-export-push-accelerates

    and the new ships will be built in China

    they make their own batteries, electric motors etc and have massive robotic assembly plants.

    To suggest the reason why is because it's not a level playing field is ludicrous, the US spends many billions subsidizing car manufacturers on top of the billions us consumers spend in subsidizing them. directly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago (10 children)

    So you think the entire world's auto manufacturers outside of China are incompetent and inefficient? People always act like the only vehicles sold in the US are domestic brands when they don't even make up a majority here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Well I wouldn’t say they’re all incompetent but look at how glacial all the “traditional” car companies have become. These guys are innovating at a speed never seen before while your traditional car manufacturers are stumbling over themselves trying to keep up.

    On the german side, just take a look at BMW and how long it took for them to come up with a competent electric platform. They just got their first car on a good platform (the new X3). Mercedes still doesn’t have a good EV, and neither does Audi. Their etron is outdated.

    Moving to the Japanese brands. I know Toyota isn’t focused on EVs at all and their hybrid is top notch so they’re one of the better ones out there. But no one else is even close. Not in terms of value for money. Not in terms of tech.

    The only ones that get close are Tesla because, like the Chinese, they’re running their car companies like tech companies and not car companies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    What innovations are lacking specifically? I dont know of any features unique to Chinese brands. It seems more like you think every company should only be selling EVs for dirt cheap prices, but that isn't realistic becausw those aren't real prices and EVs aren't yet practical for everyone which is why they make up such a small percentage of sales here still (though this number climbs with each quarter).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    Well, in Germany VW (the second largest automobile manufacturer in the world) now is laying off a significant portion of their employees, closing factories and even selling them off to US/Israeli weapons manufacturers. Their head also already signaled VW is being open to switch to weapons manufacturing. Pretty sure other German brands are in similar peril.

    Traditional manufacturers are dead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago* (4 children)

    You mean Volks "we don't even make an effort for our cars to obbey emission rules and instead we cheated" wagen is having trouble staying afloat?!

    I wonder how such a high quality company which was not at all doing funny business and using political connections is having trouble competing with those who just offer better products at lower prices ...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    The thing is, if the American government wants to be protectionist against Chinese cars, IMHO they need to pass legally binding legislation to force US car manufacturers to meet or exceed what the Chinese cars are offering and then directly subsidize the cost of those vehicles to the consumer, freely, with no stipulations. The punishment for failure to meet and exceed those expectations should be bankruptcy through immediate removal of the protectionist mechanisms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments