you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 4 hours ago (2 children)

You sure abandoned straight people fast.

I also disagree for the fact that bisexuality is wide encompassing and normalized. It's a term you don't need to understand that there are more than two genders to use.

You see in this very thread plenty of misunderstandings as to the definition to the extent that one person said they thought it meant attraction to both men and women. That one seems to be the most popular I've seen which is an issue because of how cis normative it is.

The actual bisexual definition is inclusive and I'm not calling bisexuals evil. I'm saying because of that inclusivity it also includes more problematic people. Different communities have different definitions of bisexual and it just so happens liking both men and women perfectly fits the actual definition of bisexual just as much as say a more conservative and narrow viewed of it.

You don't have to believe me but I've seen that community and I've been on the internet long enough to know not to assume just because we're both queer that the other person is an ally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago* (1 child)

    yeah I’m a part of that community. There’s transphobes in any group. Bisexuals aren’t different from pansexual people because they’re more transphobic.

    I didn’t abandon straight people, I’m trying to be succinct in making my point to you that you are generalizing groups of people based on their sexual orientation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

    No you are not part of that fucking community.

    The community in question I'm talking about is the alt right and regresive centrists. They draw the line at bisexuality and anything past that is identity politics and make believe.

    This is exactly why I say bisexuals have risk. There are entire communities that function the premise bisexuality means attracted to both men and women emphasis on the both because they think that's where it ends.

    That's why I say it's harder to find a transphobic pansexual person because in order to be pamsexual you need to be progressive enough to believe pansexuals exist in the first place.

  • source
  • parent