cross-posted from: https://lemmy.wtf/post/49143200

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/71629767

This is unacceptable. And I’m sick of all the fucking workarounds to maintain basic privacy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 65 points 2 weeks ago (20 children)

That’s when I buy a LoRa array and a ham license.

The thing about the Internet is that anyone can be an ISP and any devices can be networked. If consumer ISPs become gatekeepers, we can network without them. And then we can tunnel encrypted data over the official devices that can’t be fully locked down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 weeks ago* (8 children)

    when I buy a LoRa array and a ham license.

    And talk to who? You (and I) and the 0.001% can ham it up, but the rest of the world will be living in a different bubble.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Talk to like-minded people - like you and me here, sitting on Fediverse, discussing tech. Help set family and friends up with access. That's what I do today with my Matrix server.

    The rest of the world rarely have anything good to say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    LoRaWAN and HaLOW WiFi don't need HAM licenses unless you're just being prepared!

    I'm looking to setup Meshcore myself for a 900MHz setup.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Yeah; the HAM is a “next step” thing for if they lock down the microwave band somehow.

    But also, a HAM license is required to operate LoRa at higher power broadcast, at least in my country. At under 10km range low bandwidth, it isn’t currently needed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    What's stopping the FCC or your country's equivalent from locking down HAM regulations?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    That’s an interesting one actually. If they licked down HAM regulations, they’d lose their relief valve/last line of defense.

    It’s not that some idiotic government couldn’t do it, but if they did then they’d lose what control they currently have AND be totally screwed of anything went wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    Enjoy your upload/download speeds in the kbps on a clear day...

    I like the way you're thinking, but realistically that won't replace the internet. You might be able to run lightweight messenger apps and forums that way, but updating software? Downloading media? Not likely.

    People in densely populated areas can probably daisy-chain intranets over wifi to form makeshift mesh networks, but transferring data over distances like if you're maintaining a software repo mirror would require some other solution. The best I can think of is physically running USB drives between different server locations to keep the mirrors up-to-date.

    Of course you can use the radio to coordinate, like reaching out and telling people where to bring their USB to get a copy of your repo. Or getting enough people in one area to mesh their wifi extenders to create an intranet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    ... You can just be your own ISP? Is that, like, an actual thing one can do, or more a last ditch hypothetical thing that's technically possible, but realistically not doable?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (2 children)

    Yeah, just like you can run your own SMTP service and exchange e-mail, or... could 25 years ago before the big players froze all the small players out of the big network pool. You can set up your own internet, your own e-mail network, etc. but the Facebooks, Whats Apps, Apples and Googles of the world will lock your internet out of their internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments