▲ 164 ▼ Unbiased = Confirming my biases (thelemmy.club) submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by 1Malayali@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 114 comments fedilink hide all child comments https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources You can notice a bias towards the state media from pro-capitalist regimes from the above.
[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (7 children) Yeah dude just regular mass killings that happen every day permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] halvar@lemy.lol 8 points 3 weeks ago (6 children) My previous comment was very cynical, but when you think about it communism is the historical anomaly. Sure you can point to the Mass killings wikipedia page, but you can also do that with other topics and they also are separated into "XY under communism" and "XY" articles. XY could be stuff like "Economy", "Urban development", "Housing" or "Worker's rights". It's just a convention wikipedia seems to adhere to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) In what way is communism a historical anomaly in a manner that capitalism does not fit into? Both are part of the same historical development process. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] halvar@lemy.lol 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) It's an anomaly in the sense that it was present in high gear for around 70 years in the 20th century and most people (who are likely to read wikipedia) probably don't live in it right now. That's my one and only reason for calling it that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago I suppose I can see that logic, but capitalism too is a historical anomaly, and will too become a part of history while socialism and eventually communism becomes dominant. Framing it this way is a viewpoint that sees capitalism more as static and unchanging than anything else. permalink fedilink source parent [–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) I'm on your side permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] halvar@lemy.lol 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Yeah, I just wanted to clarify. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago Roger that; just making sure o7 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] halvar@lemy.lol 8 points 3 weeks ago (6 children) My previous comment was very cynical, but when you think about it communism is the historical anomaly. Sure you can point to the Mass killings wikipedia page, but you can also do that with other topics and they also are separated into "XY under communism" and "XY" articles. XY could be stuff like "Economy", "Urban development", "Housing" or "Worker's rights". It's just a convention wikipedia seems to adhere to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) In what way is communism a historical anomaly in a manner that capitalism does not fit into? Both are part of the same historical development process. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] halvar@lemy.lol 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) It's an anomaly in the sense that it was present in high gear for around 70 years in the 20th century and most people (who are likely to read wikipedia) probably don't live in it right now. That's my one and only reason for calling it that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago I suppose I can see that logic, but capitalism too is a historical anomaly, and will too become a part of history while socialism and eventually communism becomes dominant. Framing it this way is a viewpoint that sees capitalism more as static and unchanging than anything else. permalink fedilink source parent [–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) I'm on your side permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] halvar@lemy.lol 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Yeah, I just wanted to clarify. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago Roger that; just making sure o7 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) In what way is communism a historical anomaly in a manner that capitalism does not fit into? Both are part of the same historical development process. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] halvar@lemy.lol 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) It's an anomaly in the sense that it was present in high gear for around 70 years in the 20th century and most people (who are likely to read wikipedia) probably don't live in it right now. That's my one and only reason for calling it that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago I suppose I can see that logic, but capitalism too is a historical anomaly, and will too become a part of history while socialism and eventually communism becomes dominant. Framing it this way is a viewpoint that sees capitalism more as static and unchanging than anything else. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] halvar@lemy.lol 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) It's an anomaly in the sense that it was present in high gear for around 70 years in the 20th century and most people (who are likely to read wikipedia) probably don't live in it right now. That's my one and only reason for calling it that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago I suppose I can see that logic, but capitalism too is a historical anomaly, and will too become a part of history while socialism and eventually communism becomes dominant. Framing it this way is a viewpoint that sees capitalism more as static and unchanging than anything else. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago I suppose I can see that logic, but capitalism too is a historical anomaly, and will too become a part of history while socialism and eventually communism becomes dominant. Framing it this way is a viewpoint that sees capitalism more as static and unchanging than anything else. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) I'm on your side permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] halvar@lemy.lol 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Yeah, I just wanted to clarify. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago Roger that; just making sure o7 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] halvar@lemy.lol 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Yeah, I just wanted to clarify. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago Roger that; just making sure o7 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago Roger that; just making sure o7 permalink fedilink source parent