President Trump got in the face of ABC’s Rachel Scott after she asked him a question about the rationale behind his national midterm voter bribe.

“Mr. President, on the checks: The U.S. is still $40 trillion in debt. If your economic policies are working, why do you need an incentive for people to turn out to vote?” she asked Thursday night.

...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 3 weeks ago (19 children)

Anyone have the actual video? The link does not, and a 5 minute startpage search didn't find it either, god search engines suck now.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

    god search engines suck now.

    Truly. The enshittify. It sucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

    Remember that enshittify is just a colloquialism for how capitalism works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

    Enh. I disagree, but acknowledge it’s arguable. It sucks either way!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

    I'd say how it was supposed to work vs how its actually worked. One is a work of fiction on the level of twilight, the other is historically important. Capitalism can't control or regulate itself. Not as long as people are in control.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    It can, but it doesn’t. Whether that’s because people-are-evil or not is a different discussion. Strong regulation, judiciously applied, makes a fair market better.

    Of course money is the root of all evil, but then we like stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    No disrespect. If it "can" when did it ever? If never, then can it really?

    The one and only time we ever came close in the United States was around the new deal. But that was forced on the capitalist. And they spent the next hundred years dismantling it again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    The 70s had some good progrss in several areas. Conservative/republican/fascist assholes focused on media right after that and that’s why it’s all been going to shit, but if we could shake off this fascist cult and elect a decent government they could get back on track.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    This isn't a republican / Democrat thing. In fact if the government is involved it's not an instance. If it's not capitalists regulating themselves and making themselves more competitive and less shitty. It doesn't count.

    And it's easy to understand why this wouldn't work. Also why we had so much legislation against price fixing which is no longer enforced. Put it this way. The base mechanism on how capitalism is supposed to be self-regulating and improving. Is competition. But if you and your competitors actually compete. Your profit margins will always be minimal. Almost nonexistent. However if you and your competitors agree not to compete. You can simply multiply your margins by many times with no extra effort. Thus outside government pressure you have a fiduciary duty to the business owners not to compete. Competition is only in the consumers favor. Never the business owner.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    In fact if the government is involved it's not an instance. If it's not capitalists regulating themselves and making themselves more competitive and less shitty. It doesn't count.

    Well that’s not how I see it, but I’d agree in a theoretical vacuum like that, yes, capitalism would always fail; as we see it doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    How you see it doesn't matter. It's how they understand it. And why they've muddied the waters so that others don't have the same understanding. Why they own government, and why things are so consolidated.

    What you want is a strong social democracy to regulate and enforce against capitalism's forced negative externalities. Key word being social.... ist. The only time capitalism ever worked in a way close to how it was sold. Was when society forced it to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    How you see it doesn't matter.

    Ha! Well okay then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    Decent doge. But no really. Its the difference between you and I thinking things should work one way. But being able to understand that it doesn't, and why.

    If capitalism ever worked as advertised. It was before the automobile or the locomotive. Markets are fine. Capitalism is unfortunately fucked.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    The link does have the video you just have to scroll. They made it very small as well, but it's there.

    I wouldn't call it a lunge and that seems to be clickbait. He got closer and leaned in to tell a reporter to shut up basically.

    What I found interesting is how much his speech is slurring and how slowly he's moving in general.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    Indeed honestly it wasn't a lunge. Just another misogynistic disrespect of another female reporter. He really doesn't like woman questioning him.

    His health is getting bad, I've seen hm decline since after 2020, he's a shell of the man he was then. He fell asleep, what is it now, 34 times or something at official events on camera this term so far? He has no internal filter left, openly admitting to patheticly giving himself awards and such.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)