A woman who was juror No. 5 spoke to WBZ-TV's Kristina Rex Tuesday, though she asked to remain anonymous.

"At the end of the day, there was so much doubt," the woman said. "The prosecution didn't have a figurative smoking gun. There was not a single moment throughout the presentation of that case where you could say 'Yup, 100% I'm certain she did it' or that she didn't do it. There was too much gray area."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 7 points 2 days ago*

If it only took that testimony to convict Clancy, then there wouldn't have been a mistrial with 11 jurors convinced that there is reasonable doubt here.

For the record, I've never used TikTok.

  • source
  • parent