224
Your reminder to remove the microphone from your TV remote today (thelemmy.club)
submitted 5 days ago by to c/privacy@programming.dev
59 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 5 days ago (12 children)

Why? What can I say to remote? "Switch to channel 15?" Isn't it easier to press a button?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 17 points 5 days ago (7 children)

    It's for searching (so you don't have to type words on a virtual key pad with a remote with no alpha-numeric key pad).

    It would actually be OK, if they all had a hardware switch that cut power to the mic, but I doubt that how they work.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 5 days ago (5 children)

    Having the mic on the remote always on and streaming back to the host would drain the battery in about a day.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    Less. They're usually just a couple AAAs, so like 1800 mAh.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago (1 child)

    I don't know how they work but I would assume that the mic is not always streaming, as you say it can't be due to battery.

    I do not feel comfortable to assume that there is ZERO possibility that the mic can be made to stream without the physical button pressed ...

    ... unless I did the work to understand how it's wired and controlled, something I don't care to do. So I'll just assume they are unsafe spy devices until proven otherwise.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 6 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Streaming services have a search feature, but you have to scroll through each letter of the alphabet to spell out whatever you’re looking for. The microphone does away with both this process, and privacy.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 6 points 5 days ago

    It would be okay if it was local, and a simple voice recognition could work. Smart phones have that ability when the connection isn't present. But they're going to make it cloud driven because that's easier and opens up more "features".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent